Identity governance · October 2026 Edition
Zluri vs JumpCloud
One of fourteen models named Zluri first on the direct prompt; zero named JumpCloud. Zluri was named by nine of the fourteen models and JumpCloud by eight and Zluri carries 13 labels and JumpCloud 10, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in ten categories this edition.
Named in ten categories this edition.
First-choice share6%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate0%0%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#5#8A position in a field of 13; printed, not drawn.
Labels1310A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Zluri reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Microsoft Entra ID Governance was named alongside these two in nine of the fourteen direct answers. Microsoft Entra ID Governance vs Zluri · Microsoft Entra ID Governance vs JumpCloud · Lumos vs Zluri
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the identity governance page.
By framing
How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
ZluriFirst choices, of fourteen modelsJumpCloud
Direct10
Paraphrase10
Comparative00
Budget-constrained01
Scale-constrained20
Negative00
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.
Every model, every framing
The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Zluri and JumpCloud stood in it.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | |||||
| Perplexity Sonar | ||||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | | ||||
| Mistral Small | | |||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | ||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | ||||
| Kimi K2 | | | ||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | ||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | | |||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | | |
Zluri JumpCloud first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Zluri on the left and JumpCloud on the right.The direct prompt
The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Zluri and JumpCloud stood in it.
Zluri first, JumpCloud not the choice
1 of 14 modelsJumpCloud was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.MiniMax M2.5Omada Identity, Zluri alternatives: SailPoint Identity Security Cloud, Tools4ever HelloID
Neither was the first choice, one was named
3 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Claude Haiku 4.5no first choice alternatives: ConductorOne, Lumos, Omada Identity, Zluri, tenfold
GLM 4.7 FlashXMicrosoft Entra ID Governance alternatives: Iden, Omada Identity, One Identity Manager, SailPoint Identity Security Cloud, Saviynt Enterprise Identity Cloud, Zluri, tenfold
Muse Glimmer 30BLumos alternatives: Iden, Linx, Omada Identity, One Identity Manager, Opal Security, Zluri
Neither was named
10 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.GPT-5.4 miniOkta Identity Governance alternatives: Microsoft Entra ID Governance, SailPoint Identity Security Cloud
Gemini 3.5 FlashC1, Lumos alternatives: AccessOwl, Corma, Microsoft Entra ID Governance, Okta Identity Governance, Zilla Security
Perplexity SonarLumos alternatives: Microsoft Entra ID Governance, Omada Identity, SailPoint Identity Security Cloud, Saviynt Enterprise Identity Cloud
Grok 4.1 FastSaviynt Enterprise Identity Cloud alternatives: ConductorOne, Microsoft Entra ID Governance, One Identity Manager, SailPoint Identity Security Cloud, Tools4ever HelloID
Mistral SmallOkta Identity Governance, SailPoint Identity Security Cloud alternatives: Lumos, Saviynt Enterprise Identity Cloud
DeepSeek V4 FlashMicrosoft Entra ID Governance alternatives: ConductorOne, Okta Identity Governance, Omada Identity
Llama 4 MaverickOmada Identity alternatives: One Identity Manager
Qwen 3.7 FlashConductorOne, Lumos alternatives: Microsoft Entra ID Governance, tenfold
Kimi K2Omada Identity alternatives: Microsoft Entra ID Governance, Netwrix Identity Manager, SailPoint Identity Security Cloud, Saviynt Enterprise Identity Cloud
GPT-6 LunaMicrosoft Entra ID Governance alternatives: ConductorOne, Okta Identity Governance, SailPoint Identity Security Cloud, Saviynt Enterprise Identity Cloud
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
JumpCloud leads by twelve points.
JumpCloud15%#2 of 12Zluri3%#– of 12Mid-marketThe figures above
The order flips: Zluri leads at mid-market.
Zluri6%#5 of 13JumpCloud2%#8 of 13Enterprise
What the models said about Zluri
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. One of one in this category shown.
“mid-market-friendly options ... like Zluri, Lumos, Corma, or integrations with Okta/Microsoft Entra ID may fit better” Grok 4.1 Fast · scale prompt · first choice
What the models said about JumpCloud
No label in this category carried a quote.
Also compared
Microsoft Entra ID Governance vs ZluriMicrosoft Entra ID Governance vs JumpCloudLumos vs ZluriLumos vs JumpCloudOmada Identity vs ZluriOmada Identity vs JumpCloudOkta Identity Governance vs ZluriOkta Identity Governance vs JumpCloudZluri vs ConductorOneZluri vs One Identity ManagerConductorOne vs JumpCloudOne Identity Manager vs JumpCloudAll twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full IGA standing
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.