Snyk vs GitHub Advanced Security
Two of fourteen models named Snyk first on the direct prompt; zero named GitHub Advanced Security. Snyk was named by seven of the fourteen models and GitHub Advanced Security by eleven and Snyk carries 11 labels and GitHub Advanced Security 16, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in eleven categories this edition.
Named in five categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the static application security testing page.
By framing
SnykFirst choices, of fourteen modelsGitHub Advanced Security
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | |||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | ||
| Perplexity Sonar | ||||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | |||||
| Mistral Small | | |||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | ||||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | |||||
| Kimi K2 | | | ||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | |||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | | |||
| GPT-6 Luna | | |||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | |
Snyk GitHub Advanced Security first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Snyk on the left and GitHub Advanced Security on the right.The direct prompt
Snyk first, GitHub Advanced Security not the choice
2 of 14 modelsGitHub Advanced Security was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Neither was the first choice, one was named
3 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Neither was named
9 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
Snyk9%#4 of 13GitHub Advanced Security2%#6 of 13Snyk8%#4 of 10GitHub Advanced Security2%#6 of 10GitHub Advanced Security2%#8 of 10Snyk0%#10 of 10What the models said about Snyk
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Two of two in this category shown.
“"We are forced to use Snyk–it's basically infuriating support and false positives... it's also insanely expensive"” Claude Haiku 4.5 · negative prompt · soft negative
“Snyk appears to be the most frequently recommended option for mid-market B2B companies running modern stacks” MiniMax M2.5 · direct prompt · first choice
What the models said about GitHub Advanced Security
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of three in this category shown.
“GHAS is sold as an add-on license that can be quite expensive for a mid-sized B2B budget.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“Top Recommendation: GitHub Advanced Security (GHAS)” Kimi K2 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“GitHub Advanced Security / CodeQL if your company is deeply GitHub-native and wants SAST in the same platform.” Muse Glimmer 30B · comparative prompt · alternative
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.