One of fourteen models named Zuplo first on the direct prompt; two named Apigee. Zuplo was named by nine of the fourteen models and Apigee by fourteen and Zuplo carries 14 labels and Apigee 52, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in four categories this edition.
Named in five categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the API management page.
Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, Zuplo and Apigee were named in the same answer seventy-seven times, of the 156 answers naming Zuplo and the 349 naming Apigee. In those answers Apigee took the first choice four times and Zuplo twenty-nine.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | ||||||
| Perplexity Sonar | ||||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | ||||||
| Mistral Small | ||||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | ||||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | ||||||
| Kimi K2 | ||||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | ||||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | ||||||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B |
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of three in this category shown.
“Candidates like Kong Konnect, Tyk, Azure API Management, or Zuplo are often the right fit at this scale” DeepSeek V4 Flash · scale prompt · first choice
“Speed & Hands-off Maintenance | Zuplo | Best SaaS free tier ($0 up to 100k requests/mo); no servers to manage.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
“pick Kong for the lowest-cost serious platform, or Zuplo if you prefer managed convenience with a tiny budget” Perplexity Sonar · budget prompt · first choice
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.
“Proceed with extreme caution... built for massive enterprises with hundreds of developers and millions of dollars in budget” Gemini 3.5 Flash · scale prompt · hard negative
“Avoid Apigee if you are building a microservices architecture, using Kubernetes, or planning to integrate with AI agents.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · negative prompt · hard negative
“hard warnings to "steer away from Apigee, especially for organizations with strict compliance and regulatory oversight."” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · hard negative
“the best *general-purpose* API management platform is usually Apigee if you need strong governance, analytics, and enterprise-grade lifecycle management” Perplexity Sonar · direct prompt · first choice
“Apigee excels at treating APIs as products... make it the preferred choice for consumer-facing or partner-facing APIs” Qwen 3.7 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice
“### 1. Google Cloud Apigee Best for: Comprehensive API lifecycle management & external partner APIs” Kimi K2 · comparative prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.