AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › Zimperium zShield / MAPS · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

Zimperium zShield / MAPS

2Judge labels
0First choices
0Negative labels
2 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
1 label, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Zimperium zShield / MAPS was named 1 time in App shielding, where Appdome led with 33%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In app shielding · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Zimperium zShield / MAPS for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Application shieldingDeveloper platform0%62 of 870%1under 10 labels · led by Appdome at 33%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Zimperium zShield / MAPS yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Zimperium zShield / MAPS across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast01001
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative1 labelNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative2 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Zimperium zShield / MAPS (Great balanced mobile option)” Grok 4.1 Fast · App shielding · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Zimperium zShield / MAPS, over the 2 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Zimperium zShield / MAPS was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Appdome2 of 21Not among the top eight
Promon SHIELD2 of 20Not among the top eight
Verimatrix Application Shielding2 of 20Not among the top eight
Guardsquare DexGuard / iXGuard1 of 21Not among the top eight
DexGuard1 of 20Not among the top eight
Digital.ai Application Protection1 of 20Not among the top eight
Digital.ai Application Security1 of 20Not among the top eight
NowSecure1 of 20Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Zimperium zShield / MAPS. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 2 of the 2 answers that named Zimperium zShield / MAPS and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

appdome.com1
checkthat.ai1
cybersectools.com1
cybersecuritynews.com1
digital.ai1
g2.com1
geeksframework.com1
getapp.com1
guardsquare.com1
guptadeepak.com1

Ten of the ten domain citations in answers naming Zimperium zShield / MAPS came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

zimperium.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Zimperium zShield / MAPS takes 0% of first choices and Appdome takes 33%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “app shielding tool”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “app shielding tools”
–
not in the top ten
Organic visits to its site
about 14,656 a month
Searches its site ranks for
2,935 · 198 in the top three
Sites linking to it
7,133
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
2 ads · 2 text · 2 shown in the last 30 days

First shown October 2024, as Zimperium Inc, verified.

On Google's pages: 1 2

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 62 of 87 in app shielding
Segment leader
33%
Appdome
First choices
0 across its categories
Named in
2 answers
Its own site cited
in 2 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on zimperium.com
1,304
subdomains included
Content
1,224
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
1 · 20
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-11 to 2026-10LatestCategories named
Blog818372026-09-25SIEM, DAST
Glossary or explainer236undatedDAST, Endpoint protection
News or press80undatedApp shielding, Endpoint protection
Webinar or virtual event6202024-05-01
Report or ebook1002021-10-13
Conference or event702026-03-24
Comparison702024-08-26SAST, DAST
Podcast or video3undated
Template or tool1undated

Events in person

Last twelve months
  • March 23, 2026 to March 26, 2026RSA Conference 2026South Moscone Center Hall at the Moscone Center, San Francisco, US · exhibited

As the event pages on zimperium.com state them, read October 5, 2026.

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page zimperium.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.

Follow Zimperium zShield / MAPS

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Zimperium zShield / MAPS's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Zimperium zShield / MAPS, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Zimperium zShield / MAPS by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Zimperium zShield / MAPS is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Zimperium zShield / MAPS, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at zimperium.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.