AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › Verimatrix Application Shielding · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

Verimatrix Application Shielding

38Judge labels
0First choices
9Negative labels
11 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in App shielding for mid-market buyers
Rank 27 of 87 in the mid-market standingcriticized challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 25% of its 12 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Verimatrix Application Shielding →
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In app shielding · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Verimatrix Application Shielding for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Application shieldingDeveloper platform0%27 of 8725%12criticized challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Verimatrix Application Shielding yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Verimatrix Application Shielding across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast01113
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash01001
Llama 4 Maverick00101
Qwen 3.7 Flash00011
Kimi K202002
GLM 4.7 FlashX00101
MiniMax M2.500101
GPT-6 Luna00011
Muse Glimmer 30B01001

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct6 labelsNone
Paraphrase3 labelsNone
Comparative9 labelsNone
Budget-constrained4 labelsNone
Scale-constrained9 labelsNone
Negative7 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative38 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Consider Promon or Verimatrix if you're in a highly regulated industry and need maximum control.” Kimi K2 · App shielding · scale prompt · alternative
“suits binary-heavy releases needing runtime integrity checks across versions” Muse Glimmer 30B · App shielding · direct prompt · alternative
“Focuses on runtime integrity and multi-platform enforcement.” Grok 4.1 Fast · App shielding · comparative prompt · alternative
“Strong regulatory compliance focus; proven at massive scale” Kimi K2 · App shielding · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Avoid overkill like Verimatrix (binary-heavy enterprise)” Grok 4.1 Fast · App shielding · direct prompt · hard negative
“I would not treat Verimatrix XTD as an independent like-for-like vendor without checking its current support and ownership arrangements.” GPT-6 Luna · App shielding · comparative prompt · soft negative
“Unlike competitors like Verimatrix (very expensive)” Qwen 3.7 Flash · App shielding · budget prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Verimatrix Application Shielding, over the 38 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Verimatrix Application Shielding was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Appdome29 of 389Not among the top eight
Guardsquare DexGuard / iXGuard26 of 388Not among the top eight
Promon SHIELD21 of 382Not among the top eight
AppTego15 of 386Not among the top eight
Digital.ai Application Protection9 of 382Not among the top eight
Zimperium8 of 381Not among the top eight
Jscrambler8 of 380Not among the top eight
DoveRunner AppSealing7 of 381Not among the top eight
Zimperium MAPS7 of 380Not among the top eight
DexGuard6 of 382Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Verimatrix Application Shielding. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 36 of the 38 answers that named Verimatrix Application Shielding and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

g2.com26
worldmetrics.org25
zipdo.co21
luciq.ai20
us.fitgap.com20
sourceforge.net17
geeksframework.com15
softwaresuggest.com14
gartner.com13
promon.io13

184 of the 184 domain citations in answers naming Verimatrix Application Shielding came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

verimatrix.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Verimatrix Application Shielding takes 0% of first choices and Appdome takes 33%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “app shielding tool”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “app shielding tools”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
not counted (“verimatrix application shielding”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
0 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 1,926 a month
Searches its site ranks for
447 · 15 in the top three
Sites linking to it
1,702
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
2 ads · 2 text · 1 shown in the last 30 days

First shown October 2021, as VERIMATRIX, INC., verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 1 in the year, 1 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 27 of 87 in app shielding
Segment leader
33%
Appdome
First choices
0 across its categories
Named in
38 answers
Its own site cited
in 36 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on verimatrix.com
720
subdomains included
Content
502
counted in the table below
Documentation
8
Product · Integration
2 · 23
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-11 to 2026-10LatestCategories named
News or press29012026-09-03App shielding, Cloud hosting
Glossary or explainer9602025-07-21CDN, MFA
Webinar or virtual event6912026-07-15CDN
Conference or event1502026-05-05
Report or ebook1412026-07-20
Case study12undated
Blog512026-09-24
Comparison1undated

Most recent

Events in person

Last twelve months

As the event pages on verimatrix.com state them, read October 5, 2026.

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page verimatrix.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.

Names read as Verimatrix Application Shielding

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Verimatrix Application Shielding; a claim can dispute any of them.
Verimatrix 7

Follow Verimatrix Application Shielding

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Verimatrix Application Shielding is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Certifications
ISO-9001ISO-27001:2022
Customers named
Little CinemaTELUSSwisscomJio Platforms LimitedAntena TV GroupRTL LuxembourgizziHarmonic
Not stated on the pages read
Positioning, who it is for, price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, hosting

What Verimatrix Application Shielding's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: verimatrix.com, verimatrix.com/anti-piracy/solutions, verimatrix.com/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Verimatrix Application Shielding's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Verimatrix Application Shielding, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Verimatrix Application Shielding by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Verimatrix Application Shielding is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Verimatrix Application Shielding, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at verimatrix.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.