AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › Zenbridge · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

Zenbridge

13Judge labels
1First choices
0Negative labels
6 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
5 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Zenbridge was named 5 times in EDI, where TrueCommerce EDI led with 32%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In edi · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Zenbridge for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
EDI platformsData platform0%22 of 930%5under 10 labels · led by TrueCommerce EDI at 32%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Zenbridge yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Zenbridge across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.501001
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast01001
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00101
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00101
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B01001

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct2 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative2 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained7 labels1
Scale-constrained2 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative13 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Starts ~$200/integration monthly; cloud-based, good support for SMBs.” Grok 4.1 Fast · EDI · budget prompt · alternative
“Market for affordable, transparent, flexible EDI.” Muse Glimmer 30B · EDI · budget prompt · alternative
“Zenbridge offers good value” Claude Haiku 4.5 · EDI · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Zenbridge, over the 13 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Zenbridge was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Cleo Integration Cloud7 of 130Not among the top eight
Orderful6 of 132Not among the top eight
SPS Commerce5 of 131Not among the top eight
TrueCommerce EDI5 of 131Not among the top eight
Elevate4 of 132Not among the top eight
Celigo Integrator.io3 of 130Not among the top eight
ConnectPointz2 of 132Not among the top eight
Jitterbit EDI2 of 130Not among the top eight
Orderful Web EDI2 of 130Not among the top eight
eZCom Software EDI2 of 130Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Zenbridge. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 13 of the 13 answers that named Zenbridge and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

accio.com10
capterra.com9
g2.com9
orderful.com9
softwareadvice.com9
sourceforge.net9
slashdot.org8
cleo.com7
softwareconnect.com7
zenbridge.ioYour site6

Seventy-seven of the eighty-three domain citations in answers naming Zenbridge came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

zenbridge.io is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Zenbridge takes 0% of first choices and TrueCommerce EDI takes 32%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “edi platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “edi platforms”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
140 a month (“zenbridge”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
0 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 721 a month
Searches its site ranks for
665 · 28 in the top three
Sites linking to it
108
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
8 ads · 8 text · 0 shown in the last 30 days

First shown March 2022, as Zenbridge Inc, verified.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 22 of 93 in EDI
Segment leader
32%
TrueCommerce EDI
First choices
1 across its categories
Named in
13 answers
Its own site cited
in 13 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on zenbridge.io
1,855
subdomains included
Content
89
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
0 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-11 to 2026-10LatestCategories named
Blog5702026-06-30EDI
Case study14undatedEDI
Comparison602026-06-30EDI
Glossary or explainer602024-12-02EDI
Report or ebook4undatedEDI
Conference or event2undatedEDI
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page zenbridge.io exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.

Follow Zenbridge

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Zenbridge is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
The EDI-as-API platform.
For
small business
Free plan or trial
Schedule a free demo. zenbridge.io
Certifications
SOC 2 Type I certifiedHIPAA compliant
Customers named
Shenanigan KidsGlen RavenCyril's FoodsEstomNavigator TMSEmma SleepCabinet PartsSP Solutions
Not stated on the pages read
Price, starting price, integrations, hosting

What Zenbridge's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: zenbridge.io, trust.zenbridge.io, zenbridge.io/case-studies. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Zenbridge's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Zenbridge, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Zenbridge by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Zenbridge is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Zenbridge, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at zenbridge.io is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.