AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › Visual Paradigm · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

Visual Paradigm

11Judge labels
0First choices
3Negative labels
6 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
1 label, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Visual Paradigm was named 1 time in EA tools, where SAP LeanIX led with 25%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business28 of 126
0%7 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market83 of 113
0%1 label
under the label threshold
Enterprise77 of 98
0%3 labels
under the label threshold
In ea tools · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Visual Paradigm for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Enterprise architecture toolsIT operations and endpoint0%83 of 1130%1under 10 labels · led by SAP LeanIX at 25%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Visual Paradigm yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Visual Paradigm across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00101

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative4 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained1 labelNone
Scale-constrained2 labelsNone
Negative3 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative11 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Visual Paradigm, over the 11 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Visual Paradigm was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Ardoq8 of 111Not among the top eight
Bizzdesign Horizzon7 of 110Not among the top eight
LeanIX6 of 110Not among the top eight
Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect5 of 112Not among the top eight
OrbusInfinity5 of 110Not among the top eight
SAP LeanIX4 of 111Not among the top eight
ServiceNow Enterprise Architecture4 of 110Not among the top eight
Sparx Enterprise Architect4 of 110Not among the top eight
Archi3 of 112Not among the top eight
Avolution3 of 110Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Visual Paradigm. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 11 of the 11 answers that named Visual Paradigm and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

erstudio.com9
gitnux.org7
thectoclub.com7
ardoq.com6
itechguides.com6
capstera.com5
cio.economictimes.indiatimes.com5
research.oz.spotlightar.com5
boardmix.com4
catio.tech4

Fifty-eight of the fifty-eight domain citations in answers naming Visual Paradigm came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

erstudio.com/blog/enterprise-architecture-tools9
thectoclub.com/tools/best-enterprise-architecture-software7
ardoq.com/knowledge-hub/enterprise-architecture-tool6
capstera.com/knowledge-hub/articles/enterprise-architecture-tools-guide5
cio.economictimes.indiatimes.com/tools/10-best-enterprise-arch/1317056945
itechguides.com/buyers-guide-top-20-enterprise-architecture-tools5
research.oz.spotlightar.com/reports/magic-quadrant-enterprise-architecture-tools-2024/lead5
catio.tech/blog/enterprise-architecture-tools4

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

visual-paradigm.com ranks first on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Visual Paradigm takes 0% of first choices and SAP LeanIX takes 25%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “enterprise architecture tool”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “enterprise architecture tools”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
1,900 a month (“visual paradigm”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
68 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 328,939 a month
Searches its site ranks for
55,452 · 2,982 in the top three
Sites linking to it
17,502
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on Google
None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 83 of 113 in EA tools
Segment leader
25%
SAP LeanIX
First choices
0 across its categories
Named in
11 answers
Its own site cited
in 11 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on visual-paradigm.com
5,810
subdomains included
Content
2,251
counted in the table below
Documentation
1,801
Product · Integration
4 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-11 to 2026-10LatestCategories named
Blog1,782202026-09-23ITSM
Template or tool22902026-04-12
Case study6102026-05-28
Comparison5802026-05-22
Glossary or explainer5702026-06-10ETL
Report or ebook2302026-04-22
Conference or event1802025-12-22
Webinar or virtual event1402017-12-28ETL
News or press902022-04-18

Most recent

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page visual-paradigm.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Of its titles that name a category, most name ETL (11); 0 name the category the models place it in. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.

Follow Visual Paradigm

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Visual Paradigm is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
The all-in-one platform for UML, BPMN, Enterprise Architecture, and Agile management. Now supercharged with Generative AI.
visual-paradigm.com
For
professionals
visual-paradigm.com
Free plan or trial
Try it Free visual-paradigm.com
Not stated on the pages read
Price, starting price, integrations, certifications, hosting, customers

What Visual Paradigm's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: visual-paradigm.com. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Visual Paradigm's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Visual Paradigm, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Visual Paradigm by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Visual Paradigm is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Visual Paradigm, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at visual-paradigm.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.