Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 43 of 44, unchanged
1 category · RankedVeracode SCA
31Judge labels
0First choices
14Negative labels
13 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in SCA for enterprise buyers
Rank 43 of 50 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 33% of its 9 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business48 of 49
0%7 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market43 of 50
0%9 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise35 of 56
0%15 labels
criticized challenger
In sca · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Veracode SCA for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Software composition analysis | Developer platform | 0% | 43 of 50 | 33% | 9 | under 10 labels · led by Trivy at 31% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Veracode SCA held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · SCA · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 32 → 39 of 43
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 11 → 43 of 47
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCA | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 32 → 43 of 50 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Veracode SCA across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Veracode SCA across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct4 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative9 labelsNone
Budget-constrained5 labelsNone
Scale-constrained4 labelsNone
Negative9 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative31 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Other strong contenders: ... Veracode” Grok 4.20 · SCA · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Enterprise heavyweights (like Black Duck or Veracode) are often too expensive, slow to implement, and clunky” Gemini 3.5 Flash · SCA · direct prompt · soft negative
“SCA is often secondary—beware if pure SCA is your focus (learning curves, reporting limits)” Grok 4.20 · SCA · negative prompt · soft negative
“often too expensive for small budgets” Perplexity Sonar · SCA · budget prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Veracode SCA, over the 31 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Veracode SCA was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Veracode SCA, over the 31 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Veracode SCA was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Veracode SCA. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 31 of the 31 answers that named Veracode SCA and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
guideflow.com19
sonatype.com19
endorlabs.com16
mend.io15
checkmarx.com14
blackduck.com12
expertinsights.com12
aikido.dev11
cycode.com11
safeguard.sh11
140 of the 140 domain citations in answers naming Veracode SCA came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
veracode.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Veracode SCA takes 0% of first choices and Trivy takes 31%.ShowHide
Search and answers
veracode.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Veracode SCA takes 0% of first choices and Trivy takes 31%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “software composition analysis tool”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “software composition analysis tools”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 50 a month (“veracode sca”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 2 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 12,543 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 3,691 · 181 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 9,588
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 43 of 50 in SCA
Segment leader
31%
Trivy
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 31 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 31 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on veracode.com
1,969
subdomains included
Content
668
counted in the table below
Documentation
882
Product · Integration
25 · 7
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 464 | 16 | 2026-09-23 | SAST, SCA | |
| Report or ebook | 66 | 6 | 2026-09-08 | SAST, SCA | |
| Conference or event | 55 | 1 | 2026-08-04 | ||
| Case study | 29 | 1 | 2026-09-08 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 28 | 1 | 2026-08-11 | SAST | |
| Glossary or explainer | 11 | 0 | 2025-12-29 | SCA, SAST | |
| Comparison | 10 | 1 | 2026-08-18 | SCA, SAST | |
| Podcast or video | 2 | 0 | 2024-11-04 | ||
| News or press | 2 | 0 | 2024-10-25 | ||
| Template or tool | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-09-23Application risk intelligence september 23 blog
- 2026-09-22Application security software for business growth blog
- 2026-09-17Application risk intelligence september 17 blog
- 2026-09-17Mature software supply chain security program blog
- 2026-09-14Eu cyber resilience act 2026 compliance blog
- 2026-09-10Devsecops application security platform blog
Events in person
Last twelve months
- March 24, 2026Networking Breakfast at RSA 2026: Securing Your Software Supply ChainHYATT REGENCY SAN FRANCISCO, San Francisco, USA · hosted
As the event pages on veracode.com state them, read September 28, 2026.
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page veracode.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Of its titles that name a category, most name SAST (17); 10 name the category the models place it in. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as Veracode SCA
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Veracode SCA; a claim can dispute any of them.
Veracode 7
Follow Veracode SCA
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Veracode SCA is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Veracode SCA is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Use Fix for SCA to generate code fixes and, optionally, apply them to vulnerabilities found in software composition analysis (SCA) scans using Veracode Fix for SCA.
- For
- To manage and run SCA scans on your desktop
- Hosting
- Commercial regionEuropean regionUnited States Federal region
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, customers
What Veracode SCA's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: docs.veracode.com/r/veracode_fix_sca, docs.veracode.com/r/Set_up_SCA_agents, docs.veracode.com/r/SCA_agent_commands, docs.veracode.com/r/Mitigate_SCA_issues, docs.veracode.com/r/SCA_Upload_and_Scan. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Veracode SCA's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Veracode SCA, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Veracode SCA by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Veracode SCA is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Veracode SCA, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.