AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › Turbo EA · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

Turbo EA

3Judge labels
1First choices
0Negative labels
2 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
1 label, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Turbo EA was named 1 time in EA tools, where SAP LeanIX led with 25%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In ea tools · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Turbo EA for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Enterprise architecture toolsIT operations and endpoint0%59 of 1130%1under 10 labels · led by SAP LeanIX at 25%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Turbo EA yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Turbo EA across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash01001
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative0 labelsNone
Budget-constrained3 labels1
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative3 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Best for a Modern, Collaborative Web Repository: Turbo EA” Gemini 3.5 Flash · EA tools · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Turbo EA, over the 3 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Turbo EA was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Archi3 of 32Not among the top eight
Bizzdesign Horizzon3 of 30Not among the top eight
LeanIX3 of 30Not among the top eight
Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect3 of 30Not among the top eight
Ardoq2 of 30Not among the top eight
The Essential Project2 of 30Not among the top eight
ADOIT: Community Edition1 of 30Not among the top eight
Draw.io1 of 30Not among the top eight
Essential Open Source1 of 30Not among the top eight
Lucidchart1 of 30Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Turbo EA. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 3 of the 3 answers that named Turbo EA and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

erstudio.com3
reddit.com3
archimatetool.com2
catio.tech2
enterprise-architecture.org2
github.com2
superblocks.com2
useful-ea.com2
adoit-community.com1
archiq.app1

Twenty of the twenty domain citations in answers naming Turbo EA came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on turbo-ea.org
667
subdomains included
Content
76
counted in the table below
Documentation
123
Product · Integration
0 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-11 to 2026-10LatestCategories named
Report or ebook57undatedGRC
Blog1542026-10-01EA tools
Glossary or explainer3undated
Comparison1undated
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page turbo-ea.org exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read October 5, 2026.

Follow Turbo EA

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Turbo EA is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Open Source self-hosted Enterprise Architecture Management platform with embedded BPM.
For
Enterprise Architects
Price stated
Free and open source turbo-ea.org
Starting price
0 turbo-ea.org
Free plan or trial
isAccessibleForFree:true turbo-ea.org
Integrations claimed
12 turbo-ea.org
Certifications
TOGAF PractitionerSAP Enterprise ArchitectSAP LeanIX
Not stated on the pages read
Hosting, customers

What Turbo EA's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: turbo-ea.org, turbo-ea.org/security. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Turbo EA's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Turbo EA, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Turbo EA by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Turbo EA is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Turbo EA, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at turbo-ea.org is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.