Every category where a model named Trapster for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Deception technology	Security operations	4%	6 of 94	12%	8	under 10 labels · led by Thinkst Canary at 37%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Trapster yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Trapster across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	1	1	2
Mistral Small	0	1	0	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	0	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	1	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	0	0	0	1
Kimi K2	0	1	0	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	1	0	0	0	1
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct5 labels2

Paraphrase4 labels1

Comparative4 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained9 labels2

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative2 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative24 labels in all, every segment counted; 5 of the 6 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Pick `Trapster` or `CounterCraft` if you want a "install-and-forget" vendor tool, accept ~$1k/yr” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Deception · budget prompt · first choice

“Primary Recommendation: Trapster” MiniMax M2.5 · Deception · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“Trapster offers excellent value at roughly half the entry cost with comparable capabilities” Kimi K2 · Deception · direct prompt · alternative

“consider moving to Thinkst Canary (~$5K/year) or Trapster (~$1K/year)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Deception · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Geared more toward enterprises.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Deception · paraphrase prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Trapster, over the 24 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Trapster was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Thinkst Canary14 of 249Not among the top eight

HoneyWire9 of 244Not among the top eight

OpenCanary9 of 242Not among the top eight

T-Pot8 of 240Not among the top eight

Morphisec6 of 240Not among the top eight

Cowrie5 of 240Not among the top eight

Tracebit5 of 240Not among the top eight

Smokescreen4 of 240Not among the top eight

Dionaea3 of 240Not among the top eight

FortiDeceptor3 of 240Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Trapster. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 24 of the 24 answers that named Trapster and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

sourceforge.net21

slashdot.org17

guideflow.com16

devopsschool.com12

us.fitgap.com12

dataintelo.com11

trapster.cloudYour site11

canary.tools10

linkedin.com10

securityhive.io9

118 of the 129 domain citations in answers naming Trapster came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

sourceforge.net/software/deception-technology19

sourceforge.net/software/deception-technology/for-small-business17

slashdot.org/software/deception-technology/f-small-business16

devopsschool.com/blog/top-10-deception-technology-tools-features-pros-cons-comparison12

guideflow.com/blog/deception-technology-software11

canary.tools/10

linkedin.com/pulse/cyber-deception-technology-cisos-guide-choosing-right-anand-akela-zbmlc10

dataintelo.com/report/threat-deception-platform-market8

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

trapster.cloud is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Trapster takes 4% of first choices and Thinkst Canary takes 37%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “deception technology platform”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “deception technology platforms”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: 880 a month (“trapster”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 43 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 216 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 41 · 1 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 78
Paid Google search: No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none

Ads on Google

None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 6 of 94 in deception

Segment leader

37%

Thinkst Canary

First choices: 5 across its categories
Named in: 24 answers
Its own site cited: in 24 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on trapster.cloud

174

subdomains included

Content

counted in the table below

Documentation

106

Product · Integration

0 · 0

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest	Categories named
Glossary or explainer	12	undated
Blog	10	4	2026-10-05	EDR
Comparison	3	0	2026-06-22

Most recent

2026-10-05Stop an ai with trapster blog
2026-09-23Honeypot mistakes blog
2026-09-14Set up discord honeypot blog
2026-09-02Trapster sekoia integration blog
2026-07-06Deploy a honeypot in your company blog
2026-06-22Thinkst canary alternatives comparison

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page trapster.cloud exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read October 5, 2026.

Follow Trapster

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Trapster is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: Complete Honeypot Solution (Deceptive Security)
trapster.cloud
For: Designed for analysts who don't have time to learn a new tool.
trapster.cloud
Price stated: 3000 EUR trapster.cloud
Starting price: 3000 EUR trapster.cloud
Free plan or trial: Free 30-minute demo with our team, no commitment. trapster.cloud
Certifications: ISO 27001 Certified
Hosting: French CloudOVHCloudFrance
Customers named: INRIAPlatform58Grand EstVillage by CAUGAP
Not stated on the pages read: Integrations

What Trapster's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: trapster.cloud, trapster.cloud/en/pricing. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Trapster's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Trapster, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Trapster by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Trapster is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Trapster, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.