IT AI Index

Index › Vendors › Tencent Cloud CDN · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Tencent Cloud CDN

3Judge labels

0First choices

2Negative labels

2 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

2 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Tencent Cloud CDN was named 2 times in CDN, where Cloudflare led with 80%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small businessnot named

No model named it for this buyer.

Mid-market24 of 40

under the label threshold

Enterprise33 of 39

under the label threshold

In cdn · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Tencent Cloud CDN for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Content delivery networks	Network and edge	0%	24 of 40	50%	2	under 10 labels · led by Cloudflare at 80%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Tencent Cloud CDN yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Tencent Cloud CDN across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	1	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	0	1
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative3 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative3 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“must use a China-based CDN (like Alibaba Cloud CDN or Tencent Cloud CDN)” Qwen 3.7 Flash · CDN · negative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“High-Risk Geopolitical and Compliance CDNs (Be Cautious)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · CDN · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Tencent Cloud CDN, over the 3 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Tencent Cloud CDN was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Akamai3 of 30Not in the top three

Alibaba Cloud CDN3 of 30Not in the top three

Amazon CloudFront3 of 30Not in the top three

Bunny.net3 of 30Not in the top three

Cloudflare3 of 30Not in the top three

Edgio3 of 30Not in the top three

Fastly3 of 30Not in the top three

Azure Front Door2 of 30Not in the top three

Google Cloud CDN2 of 30Not in the top three

Azure CDN1 of 30Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Tencent Cloud CDN. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 1 of the 3 answers that named Tencent Cloud CDN and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

counterpunch.org1

news.ycombinator.com1

sota.io1

stackrev.net1

technologymatch.com1

Five of the five domain citations in answers naming Tencent Cloud CDN came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

counterpunch.org/2021/07/21/how-cdn-providers-break-the-internet1

news.ycombinator.com/item1

sota.io/blog/eu-cdn-waf-comparison-finale-20261

stackrev.net/en/developer-security/cloudflare-vs-akamai1

technologymatch.com/blog/cloudflare-vs-akamai-vs-fastly-cdn-and-edge-security1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Tencent Cloud CDN's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Tencent Cloud CDN, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at tencentcloud.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.