| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cloud cost management | Cloud and infrastructure | 2% | 13 of 76 | 25% | 12 | criticized challenger | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FinOps | 0% | 2% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 68 → 13 of 76 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“I'd suggest starting with CloudHealth or Spot if you have multi-cloud complexity” MiniMax M2.5 · FinOps · direct prompt · first choice
“Choose ProsperOps or Spot/Flexera if your main goal is commitment and workload optimization.” Perplexity Sonar · FinOps · comparative prompt · alternative
“Spot is a good fit for companies that want to reduce cloud waste and improve efficiency” Mistral Small · FinOps · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“evaluate Cloudability, CloudHealth, Flexera, Finout, Spot, or Kubecost” GPT-5.4 mini · FinOps · comparative prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“better suited for large-scale Spot/preemptible management at enterprise scale” DeepSeek V4 Flash · FinOps · direct prompt · hard negative
“Spot can be expensive relative to the value delivered” Mistral Small · FinOps · negative prompt · soft negative
“Spot.io (acquired by Flexera)... Use cautiously” Qwen 3.7 Flash · FinOps · negative prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 26 of the 29 answers that named Spot by NetApp and are not a share of its labels.
102 of the 102 domain citations in answers naming Spot by NetApp came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 1,341 | 13 | 2026-09-28 | ITAM, FinOps | |
| News or press | 195 | undated | ITAM, FinOps | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 156 | 0 | 2026-01-30 | ITAM, ITSM | |
| Glossary or explainer | 68 | 1 | 2026-09-02 | ITAM, ITSM | |
| Comparison | 60 | 1 | 2026-07-09 | ITAM | |
| Case study | 58 | undated | |||
| Conference or event | 33 | 0 | 2026-06-30 | ITAM | |
| Report or ebook | 25 | 0 | 2025-08-07 | ||
| Template or tool | 7 | 0 | 2024-09-18 |
As the event pages on flexera.com state them, read September 28, 2026.
Every page flexera.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Of its titles that name a category, most name ITAM (169); 11 name the category the models place it in. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Spot by NetApp's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Spot by NetApp, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Spot by NetApp by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: