AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › ScrapingBee · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

ScrapingBee

14Judge labels
0First choices
0Negative labels
9 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
5 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. ScrapingBee was named 5 times in Proxy and web data, where Decodo led with 41%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In proxy and web data · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named ScrapingBee for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Proxy and web data providersData platform0%16 of 920%5under 10 labels · led by Decodo at 41%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for ScrapingBee yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated ScrapingBee across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash01001
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200101
GLM 4.7 FlashX01001
MiniMax M2.501001
GPT-6 Luna00101
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative12 labelsNone
Budget-constrained1 labelNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative14 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“If your team prefers a "managed" solution (no proxy management): Go with ScrapingBee's Startup plan ($99/mo).” MiniMax M2.5 · Proxy and web data · budget prompt · alternative
“Developer-focused APIs that easily handle JavaScript rendering” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Proxy and web data · comparative prompt · alternative
“Developer-Friendly Setup: ScrapingBee or Zyte API” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Proxy and web data · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as ScrapingBee, over the 14 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and ScrapingBee was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Bright Data12 of 146Not among the top eight
Oxylabs11 of 144Not among the top eight
Apify11 of 140Not among the top eight
Smartproxy9 of 142Not among the top eight
Zyte API9 of 142Not among the top eight
Decodo6 of 142Not among the top eight
Webshare6 of 142Not among the top eight
IPRoyal6 of 140Not among the top eight
ScraperAPI5 of 142Not among the top eight
SOAX5 of 140Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named ScrapingBee. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 14 of the 14 answers that named ScrapingBee and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

brightdata.com8
aimultiple.com6
proxyway.com6
techtimes.com6
thunderbit.com6
me.pcmag.com5
scrapehero.com5
scrapingbee.comYour site5
zyte.com5
dataimpulse.com4

Fifty-one of the fifty-six domain citations in answers naming ScrapingBee came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

scrapingbee.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, ScrapingBee takes 0% of first choices and Decodo takes 41%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “proxy network”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best proxy network”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
1,600 a month (“scrapingbee”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
9 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 13,655 a month
Searches its site ranks for
4,349 · 226 in the top three
Sites linking to it
3,622
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
98 ads · 65 text, 33 image · 70 shown in the last 30 days

First shown June 2025, as Vostokinc SAS, verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 80 in the year, 18 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 16 of 92 in proxy and web data
Segment leader
41%
Decodo
First choices
0 across its categories
Named in
14 answers
Its own site cited
in 14 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on scrapingbee.com
1,191
subdomains included
Content
432
counted in the table below
Documentation
75
Product · Integration
15 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-11 to 2026-10LatestCategories named
Blog364undated
Comparison48undated
Glossary or explainer13undated
Report or ebook5undated
Conference or event1undated
News or press1undated
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page scrapingbee.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.

Follow ScrapingBee

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

ScrapingBee is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
The Best Web Scraping API
For
developers, founders, and product teams that need web data in their apps, workflows, or internal tools
Price stated
Simple, transparent pricing. scrapingbee.com
Starting price
49 scrapingbee.com
Free plan or trial
1,000 free web scraping API credits; no credit card required scrapingbee.com
Integrations claimed
400 scrapingbee.com/features/n8n
Certifications
SOC 2 Type IIGDPRSOC 2 Type 2 compliant
Hosting
Paris (main), multi-DC EU for backupUSA
Customers named
ComunicaYond+coNaveganteSeekWellNordFolkLoadsterPodscanCodeSubmit

What ScrapingBee's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: scrapingbee.com, scrapingbee.com/pricing, trust.scrapingbee.com, scrapingbee.com/features/n8n, scrapingbee.com/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when ScrapingBee's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as ScrapingBee, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for ScrapingBee by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where ScrapingBee is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name ScrapingBee, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at scrapingbee.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.