AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › Bright Data · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

Bright Data

157Judge labels
28First choices
33Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
42% in Proxy and web data for enterprise buyers
Rank 5 of 92 in the mid-market standingcriticized challenger
1 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 25% of its 52 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Bright Data →
By buyer segmentStrongest at enterprise.
In proxy and web data · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Bright Data for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Proxy and web data providersData platform7%5 of 9225%52criticized challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Bright Data yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Bright Data across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.512104
GPT-5.4 mini31004
Gemini 3.5 Flash12126
Perplexity Sonar11013
Grok 4.1 Fast20125
Mistral Small00202
DeepSeek V4 Flash21115
Llama 4 Maverick00202
Qwen 3.7 Flash01023
Kimi K210034
GLM 4.7 FlashX21014
MiniMax M2.511114
GPT-6 Luna03003
Muse Glimmer 30B11103

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct30 labels9
Paraphrase37 labels11
Comparative38 labels24not counted in share
Budget-constrained23 labels8
Scale-constrained9 labelsNone
Negative20 labels7not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative157 labels in all, every segment counted; 28 of the 59 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Bright Data: Largest network (~72-400M+ residential IPs, 195+ countries). Enterprise-focused with advanced tools like Web Scraper API, SERP API, datasets, and unblockers.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Proxy and web data · comparative prompt · first choice
“the best default choice is usually a datacenter proxy network ... Bright Data's current pricing page, for example, shows datacenter plans starting at $0.90/IP” GPT-5.4 mini · Proxy and web data · budget prompt · first choice
“Bright Data, IPRoyal, and FloppyData are most often considered the best providers in 2025 thanks to their extensive pool of IP addresses” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Proxy and web data · comparative prompt · first choice
“Bright Data is the undisputed market giant. It offers a massive pool of millions of IPs across nearly every country.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Proxy and web data · comparative prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Avoid Enterprise-Only Providers (Bright Data, Oxylabs) unless you have enterprise-level budgets” Kimi K2 · Proxy and web data · direct prompt · hard negative
“Pricing Shocks: There are multiple reported instances where automated scraping agents consumed entire bandwidth quotas in one afternoon” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Proxy and web data · negative prompt · soft negative
“Premium enterprise providers like Bright Data and Oxylabs are generally better for large budgets, not limited ones.” Perplexity Sonar · Proxy and web data · budget prompt · soft negative
“Largest network (72M+ IPs), full features | $8.40+ (paygo $15/GB) | Complex setup, stricter KYC” Grok 4.1 Fast · Proxy and web data · direct prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Bright Data, over the 157 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Bright Data was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Oxylabs138 of 15717Compare →
SOAX51 of 1572Compare →
NetNut50 of 1570Not among the top eight
Zyte API26 of 1572Not among the top eight
ScraperAPI19 of 1573Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Bright Data. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 144 of the 157 answers that named Bright Data and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

brightdata.comYour site107
proxyway.com75
decodo.com65
aimultiple.com56
thunderbit.com51
dataimpulse.com46
oxylabs.io46
techradar.com42
me.pcmag.com41
proxidize.com40

462 of the 569 domain citations in answers naming Bright Data came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

brightdata.com ranks first on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Bright Data takes 7% of first choices and Decodo takes 41%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “proxy network”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best proxy network”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
9,900 a month (“bright data”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
299 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 80,608 a month
Searches its site ranks for
10,849 · 615 in the top three
Sites linking to it
7,305
Paid Google search
6 searches its ads show for, about 35 clicks and $883 a month (estimate)
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
95+ ads · 70 text, 21 image, 4 video · 95 shown in the last 30 days

First shown April 2023, as Bright Data Ltd, verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 72 in the year, 23 before. 25 more by other advertisers linking to it.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
7%
rank 5 of 92 in proxy and web data
Segment leader
41%
Decodo
First choices
28 across its categories
Named in
157 answers
Its own site cited
in 144 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on brightdata.com
10,183
subdomains included
Content
2,752
counted in the table below
Documentation
728
Product · Integration
5,223 · 75
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-11 to 2026-10LatestCategories named
Blog2,285undatedETL, Proxy and web data
Comparison145undated
Glossary or explainer114undatedCDN
Case study108undated
Report or ebook66undated
Webinar or virtual event20undated
Conference or event10undated
News or press3undated
Podcast or video1undated
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page brightdata.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.

Names read as Bright Data

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Bright Data; a claim can dispute any of them.
Bright Data (formerly Luminati) 2

Follow Bright Data

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Bright Data is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
All in One Platform for Proxies and Web Scraping
For
humans & AI agents
Price stated
Unlocker API FREE TIER Starts from$1/1k req; Crawl API Starts from$1/1k req; SERP API FREE TIER Starts from$1/1k req; Browser API Starts from$5/GB; Scraper APIs FREE TIER Starts from~$1~ $0.75/1k rec; Scraper Studio FREE TIER Starts from$1/1k req; Datasets Starts from$250/100K rec; Data Firehose Starts from$0.2/1k HTML; Retail Insights Starts from$2000/mo; Managed Data Acquisition Starts from$1500/mo; Residential 50% OFF Starts from~$5~ $2.5/GB; Datacenter Starts from$0.9/IP; ISP Starts from$1.3/IP brightdata.com
Starting price
Starts from$0.2/1k HTML brightdata.com
Free plan or trial
Start free trial; FREE TIER brightdata.com
Certifications
ISO certifiedSOC 2 complianceGDPR readyISO 27001
Hosting
200+ countries
Customers named
RayluYutoriScaleStackVibeslistRTRVRFundableSensoParallax Vision
Not stated on the pages read
Integrations

What Bright Data's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: brightdata.com, brightdata.com/pricing, brightdata.com/customer-stories/security/abine, brightdata.com/use-cases/adtech, brightdata.com/customer-stories. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Bright Data's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Bright Data, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Bright Data by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Bright Data is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Bright Data, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at brightdata.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.