Small business▼−3Since September 2026: 5% → 2%, −3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 5% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 8 pointsRank 5 → 12 of 44
1 category · RankedOWASP Dependency-Track
40Judge labels
8First choices
2Negative labels
11 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
8% in SCA for mid-market buyers
Rank 4 of 50 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 21 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of OWASP Dependency-Track →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business12 of 49
2%8 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market4 of 50
8%21 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise6 of 56
5%11 labels
accepted challenger
In sca · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named OWASP Dependency-Track for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Software composition analysis | Developer platform | 8% | 4 of 50 | 0% | 21 | accepted challenger | ▲+4Since September 2026: 2% → 7%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, OWASP Dependency-Track held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · SCA · by segment
Mid-market▲+4Since September 2026: 2% → 7%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
7%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 7 pointsRank 7 → 5 of 43
Enterprise▼−8Since September 2026: 14% → 6%, −8 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
6%from 14% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 3 pointsRank 4 → 6 of 47
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCA | 2% | 7% | ▲+4Since September 2026: 2% → 7%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 7 → 4 of 50 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated OWASP Dependency-Track across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated OWASP Dependency-Track across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase21 labels5
Comparative4 labelsNone
Budget-constrained11 labels3
Scale-constrained2 labelsNone
Negative1 labelNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative40 labels in all, every segment counted; 8 of the 8 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“If you asked me to pick one for a mid-sized B2B company, I'd choose: Dependency-Track for centralized visibility and governance” GPT-5.4 mini · SCA · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“OWASP Dependency-Track and Scanmycode.io are the top choices due to their open-source nature and lack of ongoing costs.” Mistral Small · SCA · budget prompt · first choice
“Top Recommendation: OWASP Dependency-Track + Trivy (or Grype)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · SCA · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“OWASP Dependency-Track + Trivy is the standard low-budget combo” Muse Glimmer 30B · SCA · budget prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as OWASP Dependency-Track, over the 40 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and OWASP Dependency-Track was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as OWASP Dependency-Track, over the 40 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and OWASP Dependency-Track was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named OWASP Dependency-Track. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 39 of the 40 answers that named OWASP Dependency-Track and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
appsecsanta.com22
safeguard.sh20
guideflow.com19
owasp.orgYour site15
aikido.dev12
dev.to12
github.com12
raven.io10
itechguides.com9
community.owasp.orgYour site8
116 of the 139 domain citations in answers naming OWASP Dependency-Track came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
owasp.org ranks 3 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, OWASP Dependency-Track takes 8% of first choices and Trivy takes 31%.ShowHide
Search and answers
owasp.org ranks 3 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, OWASP Dependency-Track takes 8% of first choices and Trivy takes 31%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “software composition analysis tool”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “software composition analysis tools”
3
- Searches for its name, Google
- 140 a month (“owasp dependency-track”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 4 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 365,222 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 104,405 · 3,003 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 65,251
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on Google
None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
8%
rank 4 of 50 in SCA
Segment leader
31%
Trivy
- First choices
- 8 across its categories
- Named in
- 40 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 39 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on owasp.org
893
subdomains included
Content
154
counted in the table below
Documentation
1
Product · Integration
30 · 216
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 86 | 0 | 2025-08-05 | ||
| Conference or event | 35 | 0 | 2025-11-14 | ||
| News or press | 18 | 0 | 2024-11-20 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 7 | 0 | 2026-05-13 | ||
| Podcast or video | 4 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 3 | 0 | 2024-05-08 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-05-13Gen ai project application security risk virtual summit webinar or virtual event
- 2025-11-14Genai security project agentic ai summit europe conference or event
- 2025-08-30Genai security project uae summit hackathon conference or event
- 2025-08-28Owasp 2025 global appsec usa washington dc conference or event
- 2025-08-27Gen ai application security risk virtual conference webinar or virtual event
- 2025-08-06Owasp genai agentic security top 10 global kick off livestream webinar or virtual event
Events in person
Upcoming
- November 5, 2026 to November 6, 2026OWASP Global AppSec USA 2026Hyatt Regency San Francisco, San Francisco, USA · hosts
Last twelve months
- March 25, 2026OWASP GenAI Security Summit 2026 @ RSAC 2026 – Safeguarding GenAI Agents & Anonymous Risk in 2026Moscone Conference Center – Moscone South – Room 303, San Francisco, USA · hosted
- March 25, 2026OWASP GenAI Security Open Workshop & Agentic Hackathon at RSAC’26DigitalJungleSF, 972 Mission St, San Francisco, USA · hosted
- March 25, 2026OWASP GenAI Security RSAC’26 Jungle Party of The CenturyDigitalJungleSF, 972 Mission St, San Francisco, USA · attended
- March 23, 2026OWASP GenAI Security – RSAC’26 Kickoff PartyJames Bong Building, Market St Floor 2, San Francisco, USA · hosted
As the event pages on owasp.org state them, read September 28, 2026.
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page owasp.org exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as OWASP Dependency-Track
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as OWASP Dependency-Track; a claim can dispute any of them.
Dependency-Track 5
Follow OWASP Dependency-Track
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
OWASP Dependency-Track is its own company.ShowHide
The company
OWASP Dependency-Track is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- the open source platform that organizations use to identify and reduce risk in the software supply chain
- For
- organizations
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting, customers
What OWASP Dependency-Track's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: owasp.org, owasp.org/security. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when OWASP Dependency-Track's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as OWASP Dependency-Track, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for OWASP Dependency-Track by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where OWASP Dependency-Track is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name OWASP Dependency-Track, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.