| Category | Small business | Mid-market | Enterprise |
|---|---|---|---|
| Data security posture management | 0% · 91 of 127 1 label | not named | not named |
| Breach and attack simulation | 0% · 55 of 58 1 label | not named | not named |
| Category | Function | Named in | Named instead, first-choice share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Breach and attack simulation | Security operations | 0 of 84 | Cymulate 24% · Picus Security Validation Platform 17% · NodeZero 12% |
| Data security posture management | Security operations | 0 of 84 | Microsoft Purview 18% · Sentra 16% · Wiz 10% |
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when OpenSCAP's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as OpenSCAP, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for OpenSCAP by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: