AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › OpenCTI Community Edition · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

OpenCTI Community Edition

3Judge labels
0First choices
0Negative labels
3 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
2 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. OpenCTI Community Edition was named 2 times in Threat intel, where MISP led with 12%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In threat intel · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named OpenCTI Community Edition for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Threat intelligence platformsSecurity operations0%40 of 1190%2under 10 labels · led by MISP at 12%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.

Movement

Since September 2026, OpenCTI Community Edition held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.

Best category · Threat intel · by segment

Mid-marketnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 59 of 111, unchanged

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
Threat intel0%0%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.New this editionRank 40 of 119, unchanged

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated OpenCTI Community Edition across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini01001
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna01001
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative1 labelNone
Budget-constrained2 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative3 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Consider OpenCTI Community Edition instead if your priority is richer analysis of threat actors, campaigns, relationships, and reports.” GPT-6 Luna · Threat intel · budget prompt · alternative
“A strong alternative is OpenCTI Community Edition, which is also open source under Apache 2.0” GPT-5.4 mini · Threat intel · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as OpenCTI Community Edition, over the 3 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and OpenCTI Community Edition was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
MISP3 of 32Not among the top eight
NordStellar1 of 31Not among the top eight
FalconFeeds1 of 30Not among the top eight
Recorded Future Intelligence Cloud1 of 30Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named OpenCTI Community Edition. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 3 of the 3 answers that named OpenCTI Community Edition and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

docs.opencti.ioYour site2
misp-project.org2
analyticsinsight.net1
aws.amazon.com1
b2breviews.com1
capterra.com1
cloudsek.com1
cosive.com1
cybersilo.tech1
decryptiondigest.com1

Ten of the twelve domain citations in answers naming OpenCTI Community Edition came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

opencti.io is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, OpenCTI Community Edition takes 0% of first choices and MISP takes 12%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “threat intelligence platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “threat intelligence platforms”
–
not in the top ten
Organic visits to its site
about 661 a month
Searches its site ranks for
81 · 21 in the top three
Sites linking to it
499
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on Google
None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 40 of 119 in threat intel
Segment leader
12%
MISP
First choices
0 across its categories
Named in
3 answers
Its own site cited
in 3 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on opencti.io
911
subdomains included
Content
222
counted in the table below
Documentation
11
Product · Integration
10 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog16742026-09-24SOAR, SIEM
News or press2952026-09-29
Case study10undated
Report or ebook1042026-08-25SIEM
Webinar or virtual event3undated
Comparison302026-04-27
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page opencti.io exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow OpenCTI Community Edition

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

OpenCTI Community Edition is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
open-source threat intelligence
For
cybersecurity practitioners
Certifications
SOC 2 Type 2ISO 27001:2022GDPR
Customers named
ClearDATAControlware GmbHRivianSwiss FDFAASRG
Not stated on the pages read
Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, hosting

What OpenCTI Community Edition's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: opencti.io. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when OpenCTI Community Edition's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as OpenCTI Community Edition, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for OpenCTI Community Edition by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where OpenCTI Community Edition is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name OpenCTI Community Edition, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at opencti.io is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.