AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › NodeMaven · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

NodeMaven

7Judge labels
0First choices
0Negative labels
5 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
3 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. NodeMaven was named 3 times in Proxy and web data, where Decodo led with 41%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In proxy and web data · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named NodeMaven for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Proxy and web data providersData platform0%17 of 920%3under 10 labels · led by Decodo at 41%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for NodeMaven yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated NodeMaven across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash01001
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash01001
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash10001
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct2 labelsNone
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative0 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative4 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative7 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“moving toward mid-sized specialized providers (such as Decodo, Soax, or NodeMaven)” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Proxy and web data · negative prompt · first choice
“They offer premium, clean residential and ISP IP pools using a non-expiring balance model.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Proxy and web data · direct prompt · alternative
“Known for high-quality filters and ethical sourcing” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Proxy and web data · negative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as NodeMaven, over the 7 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and NodeMaven was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Bright Data6 of 72Not among the top eight
Decodo5 of 73Not among the top eight
Oxylabs5 of 71Not among the top eight
IPRoyal5 of 70Not among the top eight
SOAX3 of 71Not among the top eight
DataImpulse3 of 70Not among the top eight
NetNut3 of 70Not among the top eight
ScraperAPI3 of 70Not among the top eight
Evomi2 of 70Not among the top eight
Proxy6.net2 of 70Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named NodeMaven. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 7 of the 7 answers that named NodeMaven and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

aimultiple.com4
brightdata.com4
decodo.com4
proxyway.com4
reddit.com4
dataimpulse.com3
me.pcmag.com3
nodemaven.comYour site3
trustpilot.com3
cnet.com2

Thirty-one of the thirty-four domain citations in answers naming NodeMaven came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on nodemaven.com
2,417
subdomains included
Content
373
counted in the table below
Documentation
147
Product · Integration
20 · 103
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-11 to 2026-10LatestCategories named
Blog257802026-10-02
Glossary or explainer6522026-10-01
Comparison3962026-09-15
Template or tool842026-09-22
Report or ebook402026-06-16

Most recent

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page nodemaven.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read October 5, 2026.

Follow NodeMaven

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

NodeMaven is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Proxies Infrastructure for Scraping & Multi-Accounting
For
account management, automation, web scraping, and AI agents
Price stated
From $2.20/GB nodemaven.com
Starting price
2.20 nodemaven.com
Free plan or trial
Try our premium proxies for $3.50 and get 750MB of bandwidth nodemaven.com
Certifications
People Love Us, awarded by Trustpilot (2025)Top Rated, awarded by Top Business Software (2025)Customers Love Us, awarded by Sourceforge (2025)Users Love Us, awarded by G2 (2025)
Hosting
195+ locations190+ countries
Not stated on the pages read
Integrations, customers

What NodeMaven's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: nodemaven.com, nodemaven.com/pricing, nodemaven.com/features, nodemaven.com/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when NodeMaven's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as NodeMaven, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for NodeMaven by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where NodeMaven is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name NodeMaven, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at nodemaven.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.