Index › Products › Microsoft Defender Attack Simulation Training · October 2026 Edition

Microsoft Defender · 1 category · Named, not ranked

Microsoft Defender Attack Simulation Training

1Judge labels

0First choices

1Negative labels

1 / 14Models named it

1Category

October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

1 label, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Microsoft Defender Attack Simulation Training was named 1 time in BAS, where Cymulate led with 24%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small businessnot named

No model named it for this buyer.

Mid-market69 of 74

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In bas · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Microsoft Defender Attack Simulation Training for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Breach and attack simulation	Security operations	0%	69 of 74	100%	1	under 10 labels · led by Cymulate at 24%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Microsoft Defender Attack Simulation Training yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Microsoft Defender Attack Simulation Training across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	1	1
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative1 labelNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative1 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Be especially cautious about: Microsoft Defender Attack Simulation Training—if you need infrastructure BAS.” GPT-6 Luna · BAS · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Microsoft Defender Attack Simulation Training, over the 1 answer that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Microsoft Defender Attack Simulation Training was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

AttackIQ Flex1 of 10Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Microsoft Defender Attack Simulation Training. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 1 of the 1 answers that named Microsoft Defender Attack Simulation Training and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

attackiq.com1

csoonline.com1

learn.microsoft.comYour site1

tsapps.nist.gov1

Three of the four domain citations in answers naming Microsoft Defender Attack Simulation Training came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

attackiq.com/products/flex1

csoonline.com/article/2132289/breach-and-attack-simulation-tools.html1

learn.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/security/office-365-security/attack-simulation-tra1

tsapps.nist.gov/publication/get_pdf.cfm1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Follow Microsoft Defender Attack Simulation Training

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Microsoft Defender is the company behind Microsoft Defender Attack Simulation Training.

ShowHide

On record

Company records

Also from Microsoft Defender: Microsoft Defender ATP, Microsoft Defender Experts, Microsoft Defender Experts for XDR, Microsoft Defender External Attack Surface Management, Microsoft Defender TI, Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence, Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management, Microsoft Defender XDR and 12 more

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Customers named: COFCO International
Not stated on the pages read: Positioning, who it is for, price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting

What Microsoft Defender Attack Simulation Training's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: microsoft.com/bg-bg/microsoft-365/microsoft-defender-for-individuals, microsoft.com/sr-latn-rs/microsoft-365/microsoft-defender-for-individuals, microsoft.com/en/customers/story/18744-cofco-intl-microsoft-defender, microsoft.com/en/customers/story/19730-mia-labs-microsoft-defender-for-cloud, microsoft.com/en/customers/story/18747-sodertalje-kommun-microsoft-defender-for-endpoint. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Microsoft Defender Attack Simulation Training's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Microsoft Defender Attack Simulation Training, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Microsoft Defender Attack Simulation Training by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Microsoft Defender Attack Simulation Training is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Microsoft Defender Attack Simulation Training, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.