AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › Lumu · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

Lumu

1Judge labels
0First choices
0Negative labels
1 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
1 label, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Lumu was named 1 time in NDR, where ManageEngine NetFlow Analyzer led with 21%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In ndr · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Lumu for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Network detection and responseSecurity operations0%58 of 1020%1under 10 labels · led by ManageEngine NetFlow Analyzer at 21%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Lumu yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Lumu across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash01001
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative0 labelsNone
Budget-constrained1 labelNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative1 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Lumu (The Best "Freemium" option)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · NDR · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Lumu, over the 1 answer that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Lumu was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Security Onion1 of 11Not among the top eight
Clear NDR Community by Stamus Networks1 of 10Not among the top eight
Darktrace1 of 10Not among the top eight
Progress Flowmon1 of 10Not among the top eight
Stellar Cyber Open XDR1 of 10Not among the top eight
Vectra AI1 of 10Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Lumu. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 1 of the 1 answers that named Lumu and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

cybersecuritynews.com1
gbhackers.com1
lumu.ioYour site1
networkcritical.com1
prnewswire.com1
reddit.com1
securityinfowatch.com1
sentinelone.com1
stamus-networks.com1
stellarcyber.ai1

Nine of the ten domain citations in answers naming Lumu came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

lumu.io ranks 8 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Lumu takes 0% of first choices and ManageEngine NetFlow Analyzer takes 21%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “ndr platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “ndr platforms”
–
not in the top ten

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 58 of 102 in NDR
Segment leader
21%
ManageEngine NetFlow Analyzer
First choices
0 across its categories
Named in
1 answers
Its own site cited
in 1 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on lumu.io
881
subdomains included
Content
659
counted in the table below
Documentation
14
Product · Integration
1 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-11 to 2026-10LatestCategories named
Blog573undatedNDR, EDR
Case study34undatedNDR, SIEM
Conference or event21undated
Glossary or explainer15undatedNDR, EDR
Webinar or virtual event7undated
Report or ebook4undated
Podcast or video2undated
Comparison1undated
Template or tool1undated
News or press1undated
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page lumu.io exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.

Follow Lumu

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Lumu is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Network Detection & Response for Confirmed Compromise in Real Time
For
security teams
Price stated
Lumu Free $0 Forever; Insights $3.07 monthly price per asset; Defender $4.61 monthly price per asset lumu.io/pricing
Starting price
0 lumu.io/pricing
Free plan or trial
Lumu Free lumu.io
Integrations claimed
180 lumu.io
Customers named
North Ridgeville SchoolsHarding AcademyMarysville SchoolsUinta County School DistrictMeta SolutionsSublette County School DistrictBeavercreek City SchoolsOzinga
Not stated on the pages read
Certifications, hosting

What Lumu's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: lumu.io, lumu.io/pricing, lumu.io/featured-content/platform, lumu.io/resources/case-studies, lumu.io/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Lumu's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Lumu, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Lumu by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Lumu is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Lumu, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at lumu.io is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.