AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › Keploy · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

Keploy

3Judge labels
0First choices
0Negative labels
3 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
1 label, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Keploy was named 1 time in Data masking, where DATPROF led with 17%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In data masking · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Keploy for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Data masking and test data managementData platform0%100 of 1400%1under 10 labels · led by DATPROF at 17%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Keploy yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Keploy across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200101
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase3 labelsNone
Comparative0 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative3 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Keploy, over the 3 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Keploy was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
DATPROF3 of 32Not among the top eight
Avo iTDM2 of 31Not among the top eight
Delphix1 of 30Not among the top eight
GenRocket1 of 30Not among the top eight
IBM InfoSphere Optim1 of 30Not among the top eight
Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud1 of 30Not among the top eight
Informatica TDM1 of 30Not among the top eight
K2View Test Data Management1 of 30Not among the top eight
Kiwi TCMS1 of 30Not among the top eight
Parasoft1 of 30Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Keploy. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 3 of the 3 answers that named Keploy and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

sourceforge.net3
testomat.io3
devopsschool.com2
itechguides.com2
k2view.com2
keploy.ioYour site2
softwaretestinghelp.com2
thectoclub.com2
accutivesecurity.com1
augmentcode.com1

Eighteen of the twenty domain citations in answers naming Keploy came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on keploy.io
951
subdomains included
Content
632
counted in the table below
Documentation
175
Product · Integration
0 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-11 to 2026-10LatestCategories named
Blog41752026-09-25AI coding, PTaaS
Comparison12112026-08-05AI coding
Glossary or explainer9302026-06-19ETL
Template or tool102025-11-11

Most recent

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page keploy.io exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read October 5, 2026.

Follow Keploy

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Keploy is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
AI-powered testing platform: generate tests, mocks, and sandboxes from real API traffic. Any language. 90% coverage in minutes — no code changes.
For
developers and QA teams
Price stated
Free forever; $19/user/mo + additional usage; custom keploy.io/pricing
Starting price
0 keploy.io/pricing
Free plan or trial
Try for Free keploy.io
Integrations claimed
3 keploy.io/pricing
Certifications
SOC2GDPRHIPAAISO
Customers named
GlobalityIdeyaLabs
Not stated on the pages read
Hosting

What Keploy's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: keploy.io, keploy.io/pricing, trust.keploy.io. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Keploy's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Keploy, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Keploy by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Keploy is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Keploy, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at keploy.io is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.