AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › Kasm Workspaces · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

Kasm Workspaces

9Judge labels
1First choices
0Negative labels
5 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
3 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Kasm Workspaces was named 3 times in Virtual desktops, where Azure Virtual Desktop led with 22%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In virtual desktops · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Kasm Workspaces for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Virtual desktopsIT operations and endpoint2%11 of 810%3under 10 labels · led by Azure Virtual Desktop at 22%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Kasm Workspaces yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Kasm Workspaces across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash01001
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00101
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX10001
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative5 labelsNone
Budget-constrained3 labels1
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative9 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“e.g., V2 Cloud, XTIUM DaaS, or Kasm Workspaces (free tier for pilots)” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Virtual desktops · budget prompt · first choice
“Kasm streams desktops and browsers inside lightweight Docker containers” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Virtual desktops · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Kasm Workspaces, over the 9 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Kasm Workspaces was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
V2 Cloud5 of 92Not among the top eight
Citrix DaaS4 of 91Not among the top eight
Amazon WorkSpaces4 of 90Not among the top eight
Azure Virtual Desktop4 of 90Not among the top eight
Island Enterprise Browser3 of 92Not among the top eight
Google Password Manager3 of 91Not among the top eight
Apache Guacamole3 of 90Not among the top eight
Nerdio Manager3 of 90Not among the top eight
Parallels RAS3 of 90Not among the top eight
VMware Horizon2 of 91Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Kasm Workspaces. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 9 of the 9 answers that named Kasm Workspaces and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

venn.com6
g2.com4
apps4rent.com3
expertinsights.com3
geekflare.com3
getnerdio.com3
ironorbit.com3
island.io3
sourceforge.net3
abcdesktop.io2

No domain is on file for Kasm Workspaces, so its own site is not marked.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Follow Kasm Workspaces

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Kasm Workspaces's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Kasm Workspaces, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Kasm Workspaces by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Kasm Workspaces is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Kasm Workspaces, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at the vendor's own domain is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.