Every category where a model named jsDelivr for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Content delivery networks	Network and edge	2%	4 of 40	62%	8	under 10 labels · led by Cloudflare at 80%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for jsDelivr yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated jsDelivr across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	0	0	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	1	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	1	1
Mistral Small	0	1	0	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	1	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0	1	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	1	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained7 labels2

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative5 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative12 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Start with Cloudflare or jsDelivr if you want zero-cost global performance” Claude Haiku 4.5 · CDN · budget prompt · first choice

“For open-source projects or specific asset delivery, jsDelivr is a solid free option.” Mistral Small · CDN · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Public CDNs like Google Hosted Libraries, CDNjs, and jsDelivr, as they can pose security, privacy, and stability risks.” Llama 4 Maverick · CDN · negative prompt · hard negative

“Strongly Avoid for Third-Party Libraries ... recent abuses via attacker-controlled packages on jsDelivr/unpkg” Grok 4.1 Fast · CDN · negative prompt · hard negative

“High security risk: If compromised, attackers can inject malicious code into millions of websites” Kimi K2 · CDN · negative prompt · hard negative

“Public, Free Shared CDNs (Avoid for Critical Production)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · CDN · negative prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as jsDelivr, over the 12 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and jsDelivr was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Cloudflare11 of 125Not in the top three

Bunny.net10 of 122Not in the top three

Amazon CloudFront6 of 120Not in the top three

Fastly6 of 120Not in the top three

KeyCDN5 of 121Not in the top three

cdnjs5 of 120Not in the top three

Akamai4 of 120Not in the top three

Gcore3 of 120Not in the top three

unpkg3 of 120Not in the top three

Azure CDN2 of 120Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named jsDelivr. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 10 of the 12 answers that named jsDelivr and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

blog.blazingcdn.com7

devproblems.com6

best4beginners.com5

yewsafe.com5

httptoolkit.com4

accio.com3

dl.acm.org3

graygrids.com3

reddit.com3

blogs.night-wolf.io2

Forty-one of the forty-one domain citations in answers naming jsDelivr came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

devproblems.com/cheap-free-cdns6

best4beginners.com/best-cdn-providers-for-small-business-beginners5

httptoolkit.com/blog/public-cdn-risks4

dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/34994283

graygrids.com/blog/best-cdn-providers3

blog.blazingcdn.com/en-us/best-free-cdn-options-open-source-personal-sites2

blog.blazingcdn.com/en-us/cdn-compliance-how-content-delivery-networks-handle-gdpr-and-dat2

blog.blazingcdn.com/en-us/when-not-to-use-a-cdn-limitations-and-challenges-explained2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when jsDelivr's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as jsDelivr, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at jsdelivr.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.