AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › InterServer · October 2026 Edition
2 categories · Ranked

InterServer

40Judge labels
19First choices
0Negative labels
12 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
24% in Colocation for small business buyers
Rank 3 of 78 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 9 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentStrongest at small business.
In colocation · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named InterServer for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Colocation providersCloud and infrastructure15%3 of 780%9under 10 labels · led by TierPoint at 22%
Cloud hostingCloud and infrastructure2%12 of 850%3under 10 labels · led by Amazon Web Services at 32%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 2% now.

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for InterServer yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated InterServer across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.510001
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar10001
Grok 4.1 Fast10001
Mistral Small02002
DeepSeek V4 Flash01001
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash10001
Kimi K210001
GLM 4.7 FlashX01001
MiniMax M2.510001
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B10102

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct6 labels4
Paraphrase5 labels4
Comparative7 labels5not counted in share
Budget-constrained20 labels11
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative2 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative40 labels in all, every segment counted; 19 of the 25 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“This provider offers affordable colocation services without compromising on quality, with straightforward pricing and no unexpected fees” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Colocation · budget prompt · first choice
“I'd recommend starting with InterServer for lowest cost or DigitalOcean for best balance of cost, reliability, and scalability.” MiniMax M2.5 · Cloud hosting · budget prompt · first choice
“InterServer is the safer pick from these results because the pricing is explicit and the plan details are clearer” Perplexity Sonar · Colocation · budget prompt · first choice
“InterServer is often cited as the best balance of low cost, no contracts, and included basic support” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Colocation · budget prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as InterServer, over the 40 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and InterServer was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Equinix13 of 400Not among the top eight
CoreSite11 of 400Not among the top eight
Sectorlink9 of 403Not among the top eight
Digital Realty9 of 400Not among the top eight
Ultahost8 of 400Not among the top eight
Colocation America7 of 402Not among the top eight
Sharktech6 of 404Not among the top eight
TierPoint6 of 400Not among the top eight
GigeNET5 of 403Not among the top eight
Flexential5 of 401Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named InterServer. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 40 of the 40 answers that named InterServer and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

quotecolo.com29
sourceforge.net28
accio.com25
slashdot.org23
hostingadvice.com20
sites.google.com20
techradar.com20
us.fitgap.com19
feeds.sabertoothpro.com18
guideflow.com18

220 of the 220 domain citations in answers naming InterServer came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

interserver.net is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, InterServer takes 15% of first choices and TierPoint takes 22%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “colocation provider”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “colocation providers”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
3,600 a month (“interserver”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
70 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 53,424 a month
Searches its site ranks for
17,733 · 529 in the top three
Sites linking to it
6,610
Paid Google search
5 searches its ads show for, about 71 clicks and $1,026 a month (estimate)
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
43 ads · 24 text, 14 image, 5 video · 25 shown in the last 30 days

First shown October 2021, as Michael Lavrik, verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 13 in the year, 30 before. 10 more by other advertisers linking to it.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
15%
rank 3 of 78 in colocation
Segment leader
22%
TierPoint
First choices
19 across its categories
Named in
40 answers
Its own site cited
in 40 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on interserver.net
148
subdomains included
Content
5
counted in the table below
Documentation
1
Product · Integration
0 · 75
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-11 to 2026-10LatestCategories named
Comparison4undated
Blog1undated
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page interserver.net exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read October 5, 2026.

Follow InterServer

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

InterServer is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Practical cloud and bare metal infrastructure since 1999.
For
websites, apps, AI workloads, and business infrastructure
Price stated
Standard hosting from $2.50 first month; Cloud compute from $3/month interserver.net
Starting price
$2.50 interserver.net
Integrations claimed
75 interserver.net/vps/marketplace
Hosting
NYCDallasLos AngelesNew York City
Not stated on the pages read
Free plan or trial, certifications, customers

What InterServer's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: interserver.net, interserver.net/vps/marketplace. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when InterServer's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as InterServer, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for InterServer by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where InterServer is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name InterServer, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at interserver.net is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.

Badges

Wins only: a badge exists where InterServer is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.
ShowHide

InterServer is among the products AI models recommend first in Colocation providers this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.

Wide · 320 × 104 Website, beside other badges
Among AI models' top three in Colocation providers, October 2026 Edition, IT AI Recommendation Index
Show the code
<a href="https://it-ai-index.com/cloud/colocation-providers/"><img src="https://it-ai-index.com/badges/2026-10/interserver--colocation-providers-wide.svg" alt="Among AI models' top three in Colocation providers, October 2026 Edition, IT AI Recommendation Index" width="320" height="104"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the Colocation providers standing, where the claim can be checked.

Square · 240 × 240 LinkedIn, slides
Among AI models' top three in Colocation providers, October 2026 Edition, IT AI Recommendation Index
Show the code
<a href="https://it-ai-index.com/cloud/colocation-providers/"><img src="https://it-ai-index.com/badges/2026-10/interserver--colocation-providers-square.svg" alt="Among AI models' top three in Colocation providers, October 2026 Edition, IT AI Recommendation Index" width="240" height="240"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the Colocation providers standing, where the claim can be checked.

Compact · 200 × 56 Email signature, footer
Among AI models' top three in Colocation providers, October 2026 Edition, IT AI Recommendation Index
Show the code
<a href="https://it-ai-index.com/cloud/colocation-providers/"><img src="https://it-ai-index.com/badges/2026-10/interserver--colocation-providers-compact.svg" alt="Among AI models' top three in Colocation providers, October 2026 Edition, IT AI Recommendation Index" width="200" height="56"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the Colocation providers standing, where the claim can be checked.

Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.