AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › CoreSite · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

CoreSite

94Judge labels
7First choices
5Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
11% in Colocation for enterprise buyers
Rank 6 of 78 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
1 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 33 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of CoreSite →
By buyer segmentStrongest at enterprise.
In colocation · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named CoreSite for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Colocation providersCloud and infrastructure5%6 of 780%33accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for CoreSite yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated CoreSite across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.501001
GPT-5.4 mini02002
Gemini 3.5 Flash12003
Perplexity Sonar10203
Grok 4.1 Fast01405
Mistral Small01102
DeepSeek V4 Flash02103
Llama 4 Maverick00202
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K202103
GLM 4.7 FlashX02002
MiniMax M2.501102
GPT-6 Luna01102
Muse Glimmer 30B02103

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct28 labels2
Paraphrase18 labels2
Comparative31 labelsNone
Budget-constrained9 labels3
Scale-constrained3 labelsNone
Negative5 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative94 labels in all, every segment counted; 7 of the 8 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“CoreSite: Best Overall for High Support & Cloud Connectivity (US-focused)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Colocation · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“the best colocation provider is usually CoreSite” Perplexity Sonar · Colocation · direct prompt · first choice
“CoreSite is often a strong option when you want carrier-neutral colocation with excellent connectivity in key markets.” GPT-5.4 mini · Colocation · comparative prompt · alternative
“CoreSite and Switch are top choices for hybrid IT, cloud on-ramps, and carrier-neutral interconnection.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Colocation · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as CoreSite, over the 94 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and CoreSite was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
CyrusOne48 of 940Not among the top eight
NTT Global Data Centers40 of 941Not among the top eight
Iron Mountain Data Centers32 of 940Not among the top eight
QTS Data Centers15 of 940Not among the top eight
InterServer11 of 947Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named CoreSite. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 90 of the 94 answers that named CoreSite and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

quotecolo.com59
guideflow.com44
dgtlinfra.com38
gartner.com36
encoradvisors.com35
feeds.sabertoothpro.com35
techradar.com33
sourceforge.net23
coresite.comYour site22
sites.google.com21

324 of the 346 domain citations in answers naming CoreSite came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

coresite.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, CoreSite takes 5% of first choices and TierPoint takes 22%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “colocation provider”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “colocation providers”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
4,400 a month (“coresite”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
282 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 73,076 a month
Searches its site ranks for
5,520 · 572 in the top three
Sites linking to it
3,188
Paid Google search
2 searches its ads show for, about 20 clicks and $98 a month (estimate)
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
59 ads · 51 text, 7 video, 1 image · 34 shown in the last 30 days

First shown October 2022, as CoreSite Denver LLC, verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 32 in the year, 27 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
5%
rank 6 of 78 in colocation
Segment leader
22%
TierPoint
First choices
7 across its categories
Named in
94 answers
Its own site cited
in 90 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on coresite.com
862
subdomains included
Content
512
counted in the table below
Documentation
69
Product · Integration
0 · 132
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-11 to 2026-10LatestCategories named
Blog296112026-09-24Colocation
News or press8322026-09-01
Case study47undated
Podcast or video29272026-09-23Infra monitoring
Glossary or explainer2182026-09-23
Report or ebook17undated
Template or tool9undated
Comparison702023-12-15
Conference or event2undated
Webinar or virtual event1undated

Most recent

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page coresite.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.

Names read as CoreSite

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as CoreSite; a claim can dispute any of them.
Coresite 2CoreSite (American Real Estate) 1CoreSite (American Tower) 1CoreSite (now American Tower) 1

Follow CoreSite

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

CoreSite is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Secure, High-Performance Data Centers
For
enterprises
Certifications
ISO 27001SOC 1 Type 2SOC 2 Type 2NIST 800-53HIPAAPCI DSS
Hosting
11 strategic U.S. marketsWestLos AngelesSilicon ValleyCentralChicagoDenverNortheast
Customers named
Georgia ITSeceonVoxilityMLB NetworkVerizonPaul HastingsSupplyframeTOWARDEX
Not stated on the pages read
Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations

What CoreSite's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: coresite.com, coresite.com/data-center-design/security, coresite.com/customer-stories, coresite.com/marketplace. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when CoreSite's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as CoreSite, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for CoreSite by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where CoreSite is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name CoreSite, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at coresite.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.