Small business=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 11 of 131, unchanged
1 category · RankedH2O.ai
41Judge labels
1First choices
3Negative labels
12 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
2% in ML platforms for small business buyers
Rank 20 of 107 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 10% of its 10 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of H2O.ai →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business11 of 139
2%14 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market20 of 107
0%10 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise10 of 65
0%17 labels
accepted challenger
In ml platforms · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named H2O.ai for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ML platforms | Data platform | 0% | 20 of 107 | 10% | 10 | accepted challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, H2O.ai held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · ML platforms · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 19 → 21 of 97
Enterprise▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 10 of 55, unchanged
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ML platforms | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 19 → 20 of 107 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated H2O.ai across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated H2O.ai across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct6 labels1
Paraphrase2 labelsNone
Comparative14 labels2not counted in share
Budget-constrained6 labelsNone
Scale-constrained6 labelsNone
Negative7 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative41 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 4 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“looking for a low-cost machine learning platform should consider H2O. It receives rave reviews” Muse Glimmer 30B · ML platforms · budget prompt · alternative
“highlighted as cost-effective and open-source, especially for budget-conscious teams” Perplexity Sonar · ML platforms · budget prompt · alternative
“Platforms that sit in the middle—Databricks, DataRobot, H2O.ai” Kimi K2 · ML platforms · scale prompt · alternative
“Use H2O.ai if you want strong AutoML with less custom infrastructure.” GPT-5.4 mini · ML platforms · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Fragmented product suite... Standalone AutoML is a "bridge to nowhere"” DeepSeek V4 Flash · ML platforms · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as H2O.ai, over the 41 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and H2O.ai was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as H2O.ai, over the 41 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and H2O.ai was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named H2O.ai. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 34 of the 41 answers that named H2O.ai and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
g2.com20
checkthat.ai17
learn.g2.com17
pickmysoft.com11
devopsschool.com10
eweek.com8
linkedin.com8
dataiku.com7
deepusecase.com7
guptadeepak.com7
112 of the 112 domain citations in answers naming H2O.ai came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
h2o.ai is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, H2O.ai takes 0% of first choices and Azure Machine Learning takes 21%.ShowHide
Search and answers
h2o.ai is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, H2O.ai takes 0% of first choices and Azure Machine Learning takes 21%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “machine learning platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “machine learning platforms”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 880 a month (“h2o.ai”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 78 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 59,586 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 3,296 · 211 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 7,666
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on Google
None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 20 of 107 in ML platforms
Segment leader
21%
Azure Machine Learning
- First choices
- 1 across its categories
- Named in
- 41 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 34 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on h2o.ai
2,368
subdomains included
Content
1,353
counted in the table below
Documentation
399
Product · Integration
169 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 619 | 2 | 2026-08-12 | ML platforms | |
| Podcast or video | 195 | 0 | 2019-10-17 | ||
| News or press | 147 | undated | ML platforms | ||
| Conference or event | 122 | 0 | 2013-12-26 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 98 | undated | |||
| Report or ebook | 82 | 0 | 2018-09-07 | ||
| Case study | 77 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 6 | 0 | 2019-02-19 | ||
| Comparison | 4 | 0 | 2016-10-17 | ||
| Template or tool | 3 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-08-12Changes coming to h2o 3 open source blog
- 2026-07-06H2oai recognized as a visionary in 2026 gartner magic quadrant blog
- 2026-05-20Fedramp high changes the standard for federal ai blog
- 2026-05-19H2oai unveils tabh2o at dell technologies world 2026 blog
- 2026-04-28Flood intelligence blog
- 2026-04-23How h2oai addresses core data security risks for australian government agencies blog
Events in person
Last twelve months
- June 11, 2026Predictions Without Training: An Evening with TabH2O800 West El Camino Real, Mountain View · hosted
As the event pages on h2o.ai state them, read September 28, 2026.
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page h2o.ai exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow H2O.ai
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
H2O.ai is its own company.ShowHide
The company
H2O.ai is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Convergence of the World’s Best Predictive and Generative AI for Private, Protected Data
- For
- enterprise
- Certifications
- FedRAMPFedRAMP HighHITECHIRAPISO/IEC 27001:2022SOC 2 Type 2SOC2 Type 2HIPAA/HITECH
- Customers named
- Commonwealth Bank of AustraliaAT&TNIHZurich InsuranceTravelportTokio MarineStanley Black & DeckerPwC
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, hosting
What H2O.ai's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: h2o.ai, trust.h2o.ai, h2o.ai/platform, h2o.ai/case-studies, h2o.ai/university/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when H2O.ai's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as H2O.ai, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for H2O.ai by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where H2O.ai is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name H2O.ai, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.