Small business▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 13 → 26 of 131
2 categories · RankedDataiku
60Judge labels
4First choices
6Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
7% in ML platforms for enterprise buyers
Rank 21 of 107 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 10% of its 10 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Dataiku →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business12 of 139
2%13 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market21 of 107
0%10 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise5 of 65
7%29 labels
accepted challenger
In ml platforms · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Dataiku for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ML platforms | Data platform | 0% | 21 of 107 | 10% | 10 | accepted challenger | ▼−6Since September 2026: 6% → 0%, −6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| AI governance platforms | Data platform | 0% | 38 of 135 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Credo AI at 18% |
Movement
Since September 2026, Dataiku held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · ML platforms · by segment
Mid-market▼−6Since September 2026: 6% → 0%, −6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 6% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 5 pointsRank 6 → 20 of 97
Enterprise▲+1Since September 2026: 7% → 8%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
8%from 7% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 4 of 55, unchanged
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ML platforms | 6% | 0% | ▼−6Since September 2026: 6% → 0%, −6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 6 → 21 of 107 |
| AI governance | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 38 of 135, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Dataiku across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Dataiku across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct11 labelsNone
Paraphrase6 labelsNone
Comparative15 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained10 labels3
Scale-constrained11 labels1
Negative7 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative60 labels in all, every segment counted; 4 of the 5 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Databricks/Dataiku: Unified data+ML, great for collaboration/governance.” Grok 4.20 · ML platforms · scale prompt · alternative
“Dataiku is commonly cited as the best end-to-end build-and-govern option” Muse Glimmer 30B · AI governance · direct prompt · alternative
“though licensing costs are higher than pure play no-code tools” Gemini 3.5 Flash · ML platforms · direct prompt · alternative
“Some reviewers note it can be expensive for mid-market needs.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · ML platforms · direct prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Avoid enterprise-scale platforms like SageMaker, Dataiku, or DataRobot — they're overkill” DeepSeek V4 Flash · ML platforms · negative prompt · hard negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Dataiku, over the 60 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Dataiku was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Dataiku, over the 60 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Dataiku was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Dataiku. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 59 of the 60 answers that named Dataiku and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
g2.com26
checkthat.ai24
dataiku.comYour site19
learn.g2.com16
pickmysoft.com14
ciopages.com12
it-ai-index.com12
eweek.com11
guptadeepak.com11
linkedin.com11
137 of the 156 domain citations in answers naming Dataiku came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
dataiku.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Dataiku takes 0% of first choices and Azure Machine Learning takes 21%.ShowHide
Search and answers
dataiku.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Dataiku takes 0% of first choices and Azure Machine Learning takes 21%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “machine learning platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “machine learning platforms”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 9,900 a month (“dataiku”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 266 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 12,714 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 2,207 · 153 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 7,145
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 21 of 107 in ML platforms
Segment leader
21%
Azure Machine Learning
- First choices
- 4 across its categories
- Named in
- 60 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 59 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on dataiku.com
1,409
subdomains included
Content
1,127
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
40 · 11
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 743 | 12 | 2026-09-21 | LLM gateways, ML platforms | |
| Glossary or explainer | 287 | undated | |||
| News or press | 75 | 5 | 2026-09-25 | ||
| Conference or event | 12 | 3 | 2026-09-29 | ||
| Comparison | 8 | 2 | 2026-08-25 | ||
| Report or ebook | 1 | 0 | 2025-09-08 | ||
| Podcast or video | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-09-29Summit paris conference or event
- 2026-09-29Agenda conference or event
- 2026-09-29Intervenants conference or event
- 2026-09-25Succeed 2026 wrap up announcement news or press
- 2026-09-24Dataiku agent management general availability news or press
- 2026-09-24Global ai confessions report cio edition 2026 news or press
Events in person
Upcoming
- November 5, 2026Dataiku Summit LondonLondon, UK · hosts
- November 9, 2026Dataiku Summit DubaiDubai, UAE · hosts
- November 12, 2026Dataiku Exchange Mexico CityMexico City, Mexico · hosts
Last twelve months
- October 27, 2026Dataiku Summit ZurichZurich, Switzerland · hosted
- October 15, 2026Dataiku Exchange TorontoToronto, Canada · hosted
- September 29, 2026Dataiku Summit Paris 2026Paris, France · hosted
- September 29, 2026Dataiku Summit à Paris le 29 septembre 2026Maison de la Chimie, Paris · hosted
As the event pages on dataiku.com state them, read September 28, 2026.
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page dataiku.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Dataiku
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Dataiku is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Dataiku is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- The Platform for AI Success
- For
- enterprise
- Free plan or trial
- Start trial dataiku.com
- Certifications
- ISO 27001:2022-certifiedISO 27701:2019-certifiedISO 9001:2015-certifiedISO 42001:2023-certifiedSOC 1 Type IISOC 2 Type IIHIPAAGxP
- Customers named
- Johnson & JohnsonRocheOHRAAvivaNovartisMichelinSCBSLB
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, integrations, hosting
What Dataiku's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: dataiku.com, dataiku.com/legal/trust, dataiku.com/product/new, dataiku.com/company/customers, dataiku.com/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Dataiku's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Dataiku, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Dataiku by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Dataiku is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Dataiku, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.