Every category where a model named Dataiku for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
ML platforms	Data platform	6%	5 of 99	0%	15	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Dataiku yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Dataiku across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	1	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	1	0	2
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	1	2
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	1	2
Mistral Small	0	1	1	2
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	1	1
Kimi K2	1	0	1	2
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct15 labels3

Paraphrase6 labels1

Comparative18 labelsNone

Budget-constrained5 labels3

Scale-constrained6 labelsNone

Negative2 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative52 labels in all, every segment counted; 7 of the 7 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Dataiku is often the top choice for mid-market B2B companies” Kimi K2 · ML platforms · direct prompt · first choice

“Dataiku is widely considered the leader in this space” GLM 4.7 FlashX · ML platforms · direct prompt · first choice

“The Best Overall Platform: Dataiku” Gemini 3.5 Flash · ML platforms · direct prompt · first choice

“Best For: Organizations looking to democratize machine learning across both highly technical data scientists and non-technical business analysts.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · ML platforms · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Dataiku, over the 52 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Dataiku was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Amazon SageMaker50 of 527Not in the top three

Google Vertex AI47 of 526Not in the top three

Azure Machine Learning44 of 528Not in the top three

Databricks32 of 525Not in the top three

DataRobot32 of 521Not in the top three

H2O.ai24 of 520Not in the top three

Domino Data Lab14 of 522Not in the top three

Databricks Mosaic AI12 of 522Not in the top three

MLflow11 of 523Not in the top three

Kubeflow8 of 521Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Dataiku. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 45 of the 52 answers that named Dataiku and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

checkthat.ai24

g2.com23

learn.g2.com21

dataiku.comYour site14

tinyctl.dev13

aiadvisorypractice.com11

guptadeepak.com11

artificialintelligencecompanies.com10

thirstysprout.com10

truefoundry.com10

133 of the 147 domain citations in answers naming Dataiku came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

learn.g2.com/best-data-science-ml-platforms16

checkthat.ai/answers/what-are-the-best-ai-ml-platforms14

learn.g2.com/best-machine-learning-tools14

checkthat.ai/answers/what-are-the-best-machine-learning-platforms13

tinyctl.dev/roundups/machine-learning-platforms13

dataiku.com/blog/enterprise-machine-learning-platforms-how-to-choose11

guptadeepak.com/tools/top-10-mlops-platforms-202611

artificialintelligencecompanies.com/best/machine-learning-platforms10

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Dataiku

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Dataiku; a claim can dispute any of them.

Dataiku Data Science Studio (DSS) 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Dataiku's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Dataiku, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at dataiku.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.