AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › Gatewatcher AIonIQ · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

Gatewatcher AIonIQ

5Judge labels
2First choices
0Negative labels
4 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
3 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Gatewatcher AIonIQ was named 3 times in NDR, where ManageEngine NetFlow Analyzer led with 21%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In ndr · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Gatewatcher AIonIQ for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Network detection and responseSecurity operations4%9 of 1020%3under 10 labels · led by ManageEngine NetFlow Analyzer at 21%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Gatewatcher AIonIQ yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Gatewatcher AIonIQ across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00101
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick10001
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B10001

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct3 labels2
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative1 labelNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative5 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Gatewatcher AIonIQ is the platform most specifically called out for mid-to-large firms” Muse Glimmer 30B · NDR · direct prompt · first choice
“The best NDR platform for a mid-market B2B company is Gatewatcher AIonIQ” Llama 4 Maverick · NDR · direct prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Gatewatcher AIonIQ, over the 5 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Gatewatcher AIonIQ was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Vectra AI3 of 52Not among the top eight
Darktrace3 of 50Not among the top eight
ExtraHop Reveal2 of 50Not among the top eight
Alert Logic Cloud Insight1 of 50Not among the top eight
Cisco Secure Network Analytics1 of 50Not among the top eight
CrowdStrike Falcon1 of 50Not among the top eight
CrowdStrike Falcon Insight1 of 50Not among the top eight
ExtraHop (Reveal(x) or now part of Blend)1 of 50Not among the top eight
LMNTRIX1 of 50Not among the top eight
Muninn1 of 50Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Gatewatcher AIonIQ. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 5 of the 5 answers that named Gatewatcher AIonIQ and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

comparitech.com5
cdn.prod.website-files.com3
ciopages.com3
g2.com3
cybersecuritynews.com2
darktrace.com2
devopsschool.com2
dupple.com2
gartner.com2
guideflow.com2

Twenty-six of the twenty-six domain citations in answers naming Gatewatcher AIonIQ came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on gatewatcher.com
637
subdomains included
Content
201
counted in the table below
Documentation
6
Product · Integration
82 · 5
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-11 to 2026-10LatestCategories named
News or press14312026-07-16NDR, XDR
Podcast or video4012026-09-10
Blog922026-10-02NDR
Case study602025-10-01NDR
Webinar or virtual event1undatedNDR
Report or ebook1undatedNDR
Glossary or explainer1undated
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page gatewatcher.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.

Follow Gatewatcher AIonIQ

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Gatewatcher AIonIQ's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Gatewatcher AIonIQ, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Gatewatcher AIonIQ by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Gatewatcher AIonIQ is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Gatewatcher AIonIQ, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at gatewatcher.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.