IT AI Index

Index › Products › FeedbackPulse · October 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

FeedbackPulse

1Judge labels

0First choices

0Negative labels

1 / 14Models named it

1Category

October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

1 label, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. FeedbackPulse was named 1 time in DEX, where ControlUp led with 13%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small businessnot named

No model named it for this buyer.

Mid-market77 of 219

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In dex · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named FeedbackPulse for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Digital employee experience	IT operations and endpoint	0%	77 of 219	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by ControlUp at 13%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for FeedbackPulse yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated FeedbackPulse across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0
Kimi K2	1	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase1 labelNone

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative1 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“FeedbackPulse — ~$4/employee/month, no minimum seat count” Kimi K2 · DEX · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as FeedbackPulse, over the 1 answer that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and FeedbackPulse was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Culture Amp1 of 11Not among the top eight

15Five1 of 10Not among the top eight

Lattice1 of 10Not among the top eight

Microsoft Viva Glint1 of 10Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named FeedbackPulse. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 1 of the 1 answers that named FeedbackPulse and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

atlassian.com1

darwinbox.com1

feedbackpulse.comYour site1

guideflow.com1

hrinsightslab.com1

larksuite.com1

lattice.com1

matterapp.com1

monday.com1

performyard.com1

Nine of the ten domain citations in answers naming FeedbackPulse came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

atlassian.com/itsm/esm/employee-experience-platforms1

darwinbox.com/blog/10-best-employee-experience-management-platforms1

feedbackpulse.com/culture-amp-alternatives1

feedbackpulse.com/lattice-alternatives1

guideflow.com/blog/employee-experience-software1

hrinsightslab.com/employee-experience/employee-experience-management-platforms1

larksuite.com/en_us/blog/employee-experience-platform1

lattice.com/articles/hr-software-pricing1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

feedbackpulse.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, FeedbackPulse takes 0% of first choices and ControlUp takes 13%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “dex platform”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “dex platforms”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: 20 a month (“feedbackpulse”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 0 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 21,184 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 862 · 26 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 217
Paid Google search: No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none

Ads on GoogleDetailLess

4 ads · 4 text · 4 shown in the last 30 days

First shown July 2026, as Hindcast LLC, verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 4 in the year.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 77 of 219 in DEX

Segment leader

13%

ControlUp

First choices: 0 across its categories
Named in: 1 answers
Its own site cited: in 1 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on feedbackpulse.com

191

subdomains included

Content

103

counted in the table below

Documentation

Product · Integration

6 · 0

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest
Blog	66	32	2026-09-29
Comparison	25	23	2026-09-29
Report or ebook	4	4	2026-08-29
Template or tool	4	1	2026-08-29
Case study	2	2	2026-09-15
Glossary or explainer	2	2	2026-08-15

Most recent

2026-09-29For charities and non profits blog
2026-09-29Echospan alternatives comparison
2026-09-29Engagedly alternatives comparison
2026-09-28Qualtrics alternatives comparison
2026-09-28Sage people alternatives comparison
2026-09-28Tinypulse alternatives comparison

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page feedbackpulse.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow FeedbackPulse

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

FeedbackPulse is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: Employee feedback and engagement platform for growing teams.
feedbackpulse.com
For: growing teams
feedbackpulse.com
Price stated: Free /month; Pro $4 /employee/month; Max $8 /employee/month; Enterprise Custom feedbackpulse.com
Starting price: 0 feedbackpulse.com
Free plan or trial: Free plan for teams of up to 10 people; No credit card; Start free; Start your free trial feedbackpulse.com
Integrations claimed: 2 feedbackpulse.com/pricing
Certifications: ISO/IEC 27001:2022BSI C5 Type 2SOC 2 Type IIISO 27001PCI DSS Level 1 service provider
Hosting: European Union (EU)
Customers named: Hey DigitalLymphatica MedtechInvestorHubFoundation Technopark ZurichMST InsuranceTournament SoftwareFamily ChurchTidwell Bookkeeping

What FeedbackPulse's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: feedbackpulse.com, feedbackpulse.com/pricing, feedbackpulse.com/security, feedbackpulse.com/features/peer-reviews, feedbackpulse.com/customer-stories. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when FeedbackPulse's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as FeedbackPulse, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for FeedbackPulse by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where FeedbackPulse is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name FeedbackPulse, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.