AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › Evocative · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

Evocative

7Judge labels
0First choices
5Negative labels
6 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
5 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Evocative was named 5 times in Colocation, where TierPoint led with 22%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In colocation · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Evocative for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Colocation providersCloud and infrastructure0%78 of 7880%5under 10 labels · led by TierPoint at 22%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Evocative yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Evocative across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500011
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast01012
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00011
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00011
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative0 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative5 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative7 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Evocative (formerly Atlantech/others) is a solid alternative” Grok 4.1 Fast · Colocation · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“There is a notable volume of negative sentiment surrounding Evocative. Users have described their experiences as an "absolute disaster"” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Colocation · negative prompt · hard negative
“Evocative had experiences described as "an absolute disaster" according to community feedback.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Colocation · negative prompt · hard negative
“LowEndTalk threads explicitly advise "steer clear."” Grok 4.1 Fast · Colocation · negative prompt · hard negative
“Evocative (Caution / Do your due diligence)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Colocation · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Evocative, over the 7 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Evocative was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
ColoCrossing4 of 70Not among the top eight
Equinix3 of 71Not among the top eight
Digital Realty3 of 70Not among the top eight
TierPoint2 of 71Not among the top eight
CoreSite2 of 70Not among the top eight
QuadraNet2 of 70Not among the top eight
Cologix1 of 71Not among the top eight
NTT Global Data Centers1 of 71Not among the top eight
Colocation America1 of 70Not among the top eight
Cyxtera Technologies1 of 70Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Evocative. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 7 of the 7 answers that named Evocative and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

quotecolo.com6
lowendtalk.com5
slashdot.org5
guideflow.com4
whtop.com4
encoradvisors.com3
netrality.com3
reddit.com3
arphost.com2
capterra.com2

Thirty-seven of the thirty-seven domain citations in answers naming Evocative came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on evocative.com
180
subdomains included
Content
119
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
0 · 3
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-11 to 2026-10LatestCategories named
News or press5202026-02-24Colocation
Blog2702026-06-10
Glossary or explainer17undated
Report or ebook902026-04-23
Case study802026-02-12
Comparison3undated
Conference or event2undated
Template or tool1undated
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page evocative.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.

Names read as Evocative

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Evocative; a claim can dispute any of them.
Evocative (formerly Atlantech, Breezehost in some markets) 1

Follow Evocative

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Evocative is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Premier Colocation & Bare Metal Services
For
enterprise workloads
Hosting
CaliforniaArizonaGeorgiaNew JerseyMassachusettsTexasWashingtonLos Angeles
Customers named
SingleStoreExabeamMacWebFirst United Methodist Church of Chula VistaCity of BeaumontDriven Solutions
Not stated on the pages read
Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications

What Evocative's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: evocative.com, evocative.com/about/case-studies, evocative.com/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Evocative's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Evocative, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Evocative by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Evocative is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Evocative, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at evocative.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.