IT AI Index
Index Vendors › Data Theorem · September 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

Data Theorem

9Judge labels
0First choices
0Negative labels
5 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
5 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Data Theorem was named 5 times in CNAPP, where Wiz led with 46%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In cnapp · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Data Theorem for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Cloud-native application protectionCloud and infrastructure0%18 of 570%5under 10 labels · led by Wiz at 46%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Data Theorem yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Data Theorem across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small01001
DeepSeek V4 Flash00101
Llama 4 Maverick01001
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00101
MiniMax M2.500101

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase3 labelsNone
Comparative4 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative9 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Best if your focus is on API and application edge security.” Mistral Small · CNAPP · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“8. Data Theorem - covers the API/app edge” Llama 4 Maverick · CNAPP · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Data Theorem, over the 9 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Data Theorem was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Microsoft Defender for Cloud9 of 93Not in the top three
Wiz8 of 96Not in the top three
Prisma Cloud8 of 90Not in the top three
Sysdig8 of 90Not in the top three
Orca Security6 of 90Not in the top three
Rapid7 InsightCloudSec6 of 90Not in the top three
Sweet Security6 of 90Not in the top three
Aqua Security4 of 90Not in the top three
CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security4 of 90Not in the top three
Check Point CloudGuard3 of 90Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Data Theorem. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 9 of the 9 answers that named Data Theorem and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

cyberpress.org9
cybersecuritynews.com7
expertinsights.com6
cipherssecurity.com4
gbhackers.com4
uptycs.com4
peerspot.com3
aikido.dev2
decryptiondigest.com2
guptadeepak.com2

Forty-three of the forty-three domain citations in answers naming Data Theorem came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Data Theorem's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Data Theorem, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at datatheorem.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack