AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › Data Theorem · October 2026 Edition
3 categories · Named, not ranked

Data Theorem

10Judge labels
1First choices
3Negative labels
5 / 14Models named it
3Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
4 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Data Theorem was named 4 times in API security and 2 other categories, where Aikido Security led with 12%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In api security · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Data Theorem for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
API security platformsSecurity operations2%18 of 930%2under 10 labels · led by Aikido Security at 12%
Cloud-native application protectionCloud and infrastructure0%48 of 700%1under 10 labels · led by Wiz at 37%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Dynamic application security testingDeveloper platform0%39 of 580%1under 10 labels · led by OWASP ZAP at 29%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Data Theorem yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Data Theorem across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.2000000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00303
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K210001
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 label1
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative3 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained2 labelsNone
Negative4 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative10 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“I'd suggest starting with Traceable AI or Data Theorem if you have the budget” Kimi K2 · API security · direct prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Data Theorem, over the 10 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Data Theorem was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Salt Security6 of 100Not among the top eight
Akamai API Security4 of 100Not among the top eight
Cequence Unified API Protection4 of 100Not among the top eight
Imperva API Security4 of 100Not among the top eight
Traceable4 of 100Not among the top eight
Wallarm API Security4 of 100Not among the top eight
F53 of 100Not among the top eight
Microsoft Defender for Cloud2 of 101Not among the top eight
Beagle Security2 of 100Not among the top eight
Cloudflare API Shield2 of 100Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Data Theorem. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 10 of the 10 answers that named Data Theorem and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

ciopages.com6
expertinsights.com5
zuplo.com5
beaglesecurity.com4
getastra.com4
learn.g2.com4
radware.com4
cyberpress.org3
escape.tech3
g2.com3

Forty-one of the forty-one domain citations in answers naming Data Theorem came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on datatheorem.com
65
subdomains included
Content
64
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
0 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog39undatedSAST
Case study15undated
Conference or event3undated
News or press3undated
Webinar or virtual event2undated
Report or ebook1undated
Glossary or explainer1undated
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page datatheorem.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow Data Theorem

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Data Theorem is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
leading provider of modern application security
Customers named
Wells Fargo2K Games, Inc.CNNGecko RoboticsWildflowerShippoEvernoteThrive
Not stated on the pages read
Who it is for, price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting

What Data Theorem's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: datatheorem.com. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Data Theorem's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Data Theorem, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Data Theorem by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Data Theorem is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Data Theorem, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at datatheorem.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.