Every category where a model named Configure8 for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Internal developer portals	Developer platform	0%	9 of 52	0%	10	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Configure8 yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Configure8 across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	1
Mistral Small	1	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	1
Kimi K2	3	3
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	1
MiniMax M2.5	2	2
GPT-6 Luna	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	1	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct5 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative4 labelsNone

Budget-constrained3 labelsNone

Scale-constrained3 labels1

Negative2 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative17 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Configure8 is ranked #2 of 27 in itechguides 2026: a broad internal developer portal with no-code actions” Muse Glimmer 30B · Developer portals · comparative prompt · alternative

“Configure8 is a strong contender to watch due to its feature-rich free tier and competitive pricing.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Developer portals · direct prompt · alternative

“Other budget-friendly options include configure8 and Harness Internal Developer Portal” Mistral Small · Developer portals · budget prompt · alternative

“Choose configure8 if governance, scorecards, and enterprise scalability are priorities” MiniMax M2.5 · Developer portals · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Configure8, over the 17 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Configure8 was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Backstage14 of 176Not among the top eight

Port11 of 178Not among the top eight

OpsLevel11 of 171Not among the top eight

Palo Alto Networks Cortex Cloud8 of 170Not among the top eight

Roadie6 of 171Not among the top eight

Atlassian Compass6 of 170Not among the top eight

Humanitec6 of 170Not among the top eight

Port.io4 of 171Not among the top eight

Cycloid4 of 170Not among the top eight

Harness IDP3 of 170Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Configure8. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 17 of the 17 answers that named Configure8 and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

gartner.com12

itechguides.com12

port.io12

dupple.com11

cycloid.io10

guideflow.com10

sourceforge.net7

guptadeepak.com6

opslevel.com6

platformengineering.org5

No domain is on file for Configure8, so its own site is not marked.

Pages cited

gartner.com/reviews/market/internal-developer-portals12

dupple.com/learn/best-internal-developer-portals11

guideflow.com/blog/internal-developer-platform10

itechguides.com/best/internal-developer-portals10

port.io/blog/top-5-internal-developer-platform-tools10

cycloid.io/blog/top-11-internal-developer-platforms-idps-in-20266

guptadeepak.com/tools/top-6-internal-developer-portals-20266

itechguides.com/best/internal-developer-platforms4

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

Where Configure8 stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Searches for its name, Google: 20 a month (“configure8”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 0 a month
Its own site: No site of its own on file, so no site figures

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 9 of 52 in developer portals

Segment leader

53%

Port

First choices: 1 across its categories
Named in: 17 answers
Its own site cited: No site on file to match

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

Names read as Configure8

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Configure8; a claim can dispute any of them.

configure8 4

Follow Configure8

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Configure8's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Configure8, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Configure8 by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Configure8 is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Configure8, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.