IT AI Index
Index Vendors › ChromaDB · September 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

ChromaDB

16Judge labels
0First choices
6Negative labels
8 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
9 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. ChromaDB was named 9 times in Vector databases, where Qdrant led with 37%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In vector databases · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named ChromaDB for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Vector databasesData platform0%22 of 2444%9under 10 labels · led by Qdrant at 37%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for ChromaDB yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated ChromaDB across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00011
Mistral Small01012
DeepSeek V4 Flash01012
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00011
Kimi K201001
GLM 4.7 FlashX02002
MiniMax M2.500000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct2 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative6 labelsNone
Budget-constrained3 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative5 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative16 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“If you have absolutely no infrastructure budget at all and just need to test, start with Chroma.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Vector databases · budget prompt · alternative
“Chroma is ideal for early-stage development, but not for heavy production workloads.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Vector databases · budget prompt · alternative
“Choose ChromaDB if: You’re in prototyping, MVP, or small‑scale RAG.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Vector databases · comparative prompt · alternative
“Best For: Prototyping, MVPs, local development” Kimi K2 · Vector databases · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“it's generally recommended to avoid it for production workloads or large-scale applications” Mistral Small · Vector databases · negative prompt · hard negative
“ChromaDB — don't use in production at scale” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Vector databases · negative prompt · hard negative
“Not designed for heavy production workloads at scale; limited filtering and hybrid search capabilities compared to others.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Vector databases · comparative prompt · soft negative
“Not production-ready: memory leaks... Anything beyond MVP/prototyping. Recent CVEs highlight security risks.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Vector databases · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as ChromaDB, over the 16 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and ChromaDB was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
pgvector15 of 169Not in the top three
Qdrant15 of 166Not in the top three
Weaviate15 of 160Not in the top three
Pinecone14 of 166Not in the top three
Milvus / Zilliz Cloud8 of 160Not in the top three
Milvus6 of 160Not in the top three
FAISS4 of 160Not in the top three
LanceDB3 of 160Not in the top three
Redis3 of 160Not in the top three
Vespa3 of 160Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named ChromaDB. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 15 of the 16 answers that named ChromaDB and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

firecrawl.dev14
dev.to9
encore.dev9
redis.io7
deploybase.ai6
actian.com4
liveblocks.io4
marktechpost.com4
mixpeek.com4
pecollective.com4

Sixty-five of the sixty-five domain citations in answers naming ChromaDB came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when ChromaDB's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as ChromaDB, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at chromadb.dev is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack