| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vector databases | Data platform | 0% | 22 of 24 | 44% | 9 | under 10 labels · led by Qdrant at 37% |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“If you have absolutely no infrastructure budget at all and just need to test, start with Chroma.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Vector databases · budget prompt · alternative
“Chroma is ideal for early-stage development, but not for heavy production workloads.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Vector databases · budget prompt · alternative
“Choose ChromaDB if: You’re in prototyping, MVP, or small‑scale RAG.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Vector databases · comparative prompt · alternative
“Best For: Prototyping, MVPs, local development” Kimi K2 · Vector databases · comparative prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“it's generally recommended to avoid it for production workloads or large-scale applications” Mistral Small · Vector databases · negative prompt · hard negative
“ChromaDB — don't use in production at scale” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Vector databases · negative prompt · hard negative
“Not designed for heavy production workloads at scale; limited filtering and hybrid search capabilities compared to others.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Vector databases · comparative prompt · soft negative
“Not production-ready: memory leaks... Anything beyond MVP/prototyping. Recent CVEs highlight security risks.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Vector databases · negative prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 15 of the 16 answers that named ChromaDB and are not a share of its labels.
Sixty-five of the sixty-five domain citations in answers naming ChromaDB came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when ChromaDB's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as ChromaDB, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at chromadb.dev is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.
Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.