IT AI Index

Index › Products › Cerberus FTP Server (On-Premises) — Professional Edition · October 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Cerberus FTP Server (On-Premises) — Professional Edition

1Judge labels

0First choices

0Negative labels

1 / 14Models named it

1Category

October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

1 label, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Cerberus FTP Server (On-Premises) — Professional Edition was named 1 time in MFT, where Files.com led with 43%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small businessnot named

No model named it for this buyer.

Mid-market40 of 97

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In mft · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Cerberus FTP Server (On-Premises) — Professional Edition for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Managed file transfer	Data platform	0%	40 of 97	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Files.com at 43%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Cerberus FTP Server (On-Premises) — Professional Edition yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Cerberus FTP Server (On-Premises) — Professional Edition across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained1 labelNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative1 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“If you have a Windows server and want to save on recurring costs → [Cerberus FTP Server]” DeepSeek V4 Flash · MFT · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Cerberus FTP Server (On-Premises) — Professional Edition, over the 1 answer that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Cerberus FTP Server (On-Premises) — Professional Edition was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Files.com1 of 11Not among the top eight

MASV1 of 10Not among the top eight

SFTPGo1 of 10Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Cerberus FTP Server (On-Premises) — Professional Edition. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 1 of the 1 answers that named Cerberus FTP Server (On-Premises) — Professional Edition and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

aimultiple.com1

bluefinch-esbd.com1

cerberusftp.comYour site1

expertinsights.com1

fast.io1

files.com1

g2.com1

itechguides.com1

learn.g2.com1

sftptogo.com1

Nine of the ten domain citations in answers naming Cerberus FTP Server (On-Premises) — Professional Edition came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

aimultiple.com/managed-file-transfer-solutions1

bluefinch-esbd.com/en/comparison-main-mft-solutions-on-the-market1

cerberusftp.com/cerberus-ftp-server-enterprise-edition-new1

cerberusftp.com/ftp-server-comparisons/cerberus-ftp-server-vs-diplomat-mft1

cerberusftp.com/ftp-server-comparisons/cerberus-ftp-server-vs-serv-u1

cerberusftp.com/lp/comparison-cerberus-ftp-server-serv-u-alternative1

cerberusftp.com/pricing1

expertinsights.com/data-security-and-privacy/the-top-managed-file-transfer-solutions1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

cerberusftp.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Cerberus FTP Server (On-Premises) — Professional Edition takes 0% of first choices and Files.com takes 43%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “managed file transfer solution”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “managed file transfer solutions”

–

not in the top ten

Organic visits to its site: about 10,833 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 1,692 · 110 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 2,238
Paid Google search: No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none

Ads on GoogleDetailLess

104 ads · 101 text, 3 video · 83 shown in the last 30 days

First shown November 2024, as REDWOOD SOFTWARE, INC., verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 1 in the year, 103 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 40 of 97 in MFT

Segment leader

43%

Files.com

First choices: 0 across its categories
Named in: 1 answers
Its own site cited: in 1 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on cerberusftp.com

311

subdomains included

Content

270

counted in the table below

Documentation

Product · Integration

0 · 0

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest	Categories named
Blog	195	3	2026-09-09	MFT
Glossary or explainer	66	0	2025-12-21	MFT
Comparison	8	0	2024-05-24	MFT
Report or ebook	1	undated

Most recent

2026-09-09Using file transfer logs and audit trails to improve security and operations 2 blog
2026-09-02How to replace batch transfer with mft automation blog
2026-08-26Cerberus ftp server by redwood version 2026 3 cloud storage support security hardening and more blog
2026-05-26Cerberus ftp server by redwood version 2026 2 enhancing the quality of life for admins and users blog
2026-03-31Cerberus by redwood version 2026 1 hardening your environment with fips 140 3 and advanced security guardrails blog
2026-02-23Emerging compliance standards impacting file transfer in 2026 blog

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page cerberusftp.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read October 5, 2026.

Follow Cerberus FTP Server (On-Premises) — Professional Edition

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Cerberus FTP Server (On-Premises) — Professional Edition is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: The Secure and Compliant File Transfer Server Solution
cerberusftp.com
For: organizations
cerberusftp.com
Free plan or trial: 25-day free trial cerberusftp.com
Certifications: PCI DSSHIPAAFIPS-140-2GDPR
Customers named: Duke Health Technology SolutionsCompanion Corporation
Not stated on the pages read: Price, starting price, integrations, hosting

What Cerberus FTP Server (On-Premises) — Professional Edition's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: cerberusftp.com. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Cerberus FTP Server (On-Premises) — Professional Edition's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Cerberus FTP Server (On-Premises) — Professional Edition, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Cerberus FTP Server (On-Premises) — Professional Edition by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Cerberus FTP Server (On-Premises) — Professional Edition is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Cerberus FTP Server (On-Premises) — Professional Edition, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.