AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Data platform › Proxy and web data › Bright Data vs SOAX
Proxy and web data providers · October 2026 Edition

Bright Data vs SOAX

One of fourteen models named Bright Data first on the direct prompt; one named SOAX. Bright Data was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and SOAX by twelve and Bright Data carries 52 labels and SOAX 23, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Bright Data

criticized challenger

Named in one category this edition.

SOAX

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

First-choice share7%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate25%0%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#5#6A position in a field of 11; printed, not drawn.
Labels5223A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Bright Data reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Oxylabs was named alongside these two in twelve of the fourteen direct answers. Decodo vs Bright Data · Decodo vs SOAX · Smartproxy vs Bright Data

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the proxy and web data providers page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
Bright DataFirst choices, of fourteen modelsSOAX
Direct113 against Bright Data
Paraphrase103 against Bright Data
Comparative100
Budget-constrained103 against Bright Data
Scale-constrained00
Negative214 against Bright Data
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, Bright Data and SOAX were named in the same answer fifty-one times, of the 157 answers naming Bright Data and the 58 naming SOAX. In those answers SOAX took the first choice two times and Bright Data twenty-two.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Bright Data and SOAX stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 Fast
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
Bright Data SOAX first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Bright Data on the left and SOAX on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Bright Data and SOAX stood in it.

Bright Data first, SOAX an alternative

1 of 14 modelsSOAX was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
GPT-5.4 miniBright Data, Oxylabs alternatives: Decodo, NetNut, SOAX

SOAX first, Bright Data an alternative

1 of 14 modelsBright Data was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Gemini 3.5 FlashSOAX, Smartproxy alternatives: Bright Data, NetNut, NodeMaven, Oxylabs, SimplyNode

Neither was the first choice, one was named

7 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Claude Haiku 4.5Decodo, Oxylabs alternatives: Bright Data, SOAX
Grok 4.1 FastDecodo alternatives: Oxylabs, SOAX
DeepSeek V4 FlashSmartproxy alternatives: Oxylabs, SOAX
Kimi K2Decodo alternatives: DataImpulse, SOAX
GLM 4.7 FlashXSmartproxy alternatives: Bright Data, Oxylabs, SOAX, Webshare
GPT-6 LunaDecodo alternatives: Bright Data, Oxylabs
Muse Glimmer 30BDecodo alternatives: Infatica, SOAX

Neither was named

5 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Perplexity SonarDecodo alternatives: Oxylabs, Proxy-Seller
Mistral SmallDecodo alternatives: Oxylabs, ProxyWing
Llama 4 MaverickDecodo alternatives: Infatica, Oxylabs, ProxyWing
Qwen 3.7 FlashDecodo alternatives: Oxylabs
MiniMax M2.5Rayobyte, Smartproxy alternatives: Oxylabs

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Bright Data leads by eight points.
Bright Data8%#4 of 9
SOAX0%#8 of 9
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Bright Data leads by four points.
Bright Data7%#5 of 11
SOAX2%#6 of 11
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Bright Data leads by forty-two points.
Bright Data42%#2 of 7
SOAX0%#5 of 7
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Bright Data

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.

“Avoid Enterprise-Only Providers (Bright Data, Oxylabs) unless you have enterprise-level budgets” Kimi K2 · direct prompt · hard negative
“Pricing Shocks: There are multiple reported instances where automated scraping agents consumed entire bandwidth quotas in one afternoon” Qwen 3.7 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“Premium enterprise providers like Bright Data and Oxylabs are generally better for large budgets, not limited ones.” Perplexity Sonar · budget prompt · soft negative
“Bright Data: Largest network (~72-400M+ residential IPs, 195+ countries). Enterprise-focused with advanced tools like Web Scraper API, SERP API, datasets, and unblockers.” Grok 4.1 Fast · comparative prompt · first choice
“the best default choice is usually a datacenter proxy network ... Bright Data's current pricing page, for example, shows datacenter plans starting at $0.90/IP” GPT-5.4 mini · budget prompt · first choice
“Bright Data, IPRoyal, and FloppyData are most often considered the best providers in 2025 thanks to their extensive pool of IP addresses” Claude Haiku 4.5 · comparative prompt · first choice

What the models said about SOAX

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.

“moving toward mid-sized specialized providers (such as Decodo, Soax, or NodeMaven)” Qwen 3.7 Flash · negative prompt · first choice
“The Best All-Rounders: Smartproxy & SOAX” Gemini 3.5 Flash · direct prompt · first choice
“SOAX: Predictable pricing, 155M+ IPs (strong mobile/residential). City/ZIP/ASN targeting, stable for business.” Grok 4.1 Fast · comparative prompt · alternative
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.