IT AI Index
Index Vendors › BigML · September 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

BigML

15Judge labels
1First choices
0Negative labels
8 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
2% in ML platforms for small business buyers
Rank 24 of 99 in the mid-market standing
0 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 4 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In ml platforms · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named BigML for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
ML platformsData platform0%24 of 990%4under 10 labels · led by Azure Machine Learning at 17%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for BigML yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated BigML across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar01001
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small01001
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick01001
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200101
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct3 labels1
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative1 labelNone
Budget-constrained7 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative4 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative15 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Offers an entry-level plan for AutoML and simple deployment, which can be cost-effective for small businesses” Mistral Small · ML platforms · budget prompt · alternative
“Other options include Google Vertex AI (AI Platform) and BigML, which offer affordable pricing models” Llama 4 Maverick · ML platforms · budget prompt · alternative
“A good option if you want simple AutoML and hosted predictions” Perplexity Sonar · ML platforms · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as BigML, over the 15 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and BigML was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Azure Machine Learning10 of 151Not in the top three
KNIME9 of 155Not in the top three
Google Vertex AI9 of 152Not in the top three
Amazon SageMaker7 of 150Not in the top three
Google Colab4 of 152Not in the top three
MLflow4 of 152Not in the top three
KNIME Analytics Platform3 of 152Not in the top three
Kaggle3 of 151Not in the top three
RapidMiner3 of 151Not in the top three
DataRobot3 of 150Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named BigML. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 15 of the 15 answers that named BigML and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

g2.com12
startupstash.com12
godofprompt.ai8
softwr.com7
learn.g2.com6
articsledge.com5
deepusecase.com4
devopsschool.com4
reddit.com4
appreviewlab.com3

Sixty-five of the sixty-five domain citations in answers naming BigML came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when BigML's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as BigML, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at bigml.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.