1 category · Named, not rankedAtomic Red Team
Standing by category
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach and attack simulation | Security operations | 0% | 21 of 74 | 0% | 6 | under 10 labels · led by Cymulate at 24% |
Movement
By model
How each model treated Atomic Red Team across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Extremely lightweight; you just download the scripts and run them directly on target machines to test your alerts.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · BAS · budget prompt · alternative
“look at mid-market options like Cymulate or open-source frameworks (e.g., Atomic Red Team, Infection Monkey)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · BAS · negative prompt · alternative
“Atomic Red Team is Red Canary's free library of small, focused tests mapped to MITRE ATT&CK techniques” Muse Glimmer 30B · BAS · budget prompt · alternative
“Lightweight scripts for ATT&CK validation; pairs well with Caldera for basics” Grok 4.1 Fast · BAS · budget prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Atomic Red Team, over the 17 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Atomic Red Team was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
What carried it into the answer
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 17 of the 17 answers that named Atomic Red Team and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
Fifty-seven of the sixty-two domain citations in answers naming Atomic Red Team came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
atomicredteam.io is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Atomic Red Team takes 0% of first choices and Cymulate takes 24%.ShowHide
Search and answers
In search
Google, US estimates- Searches for its name, Google
- 880 a month (“atomic red team”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 15 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 388 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 172 · 15 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 613
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This edition- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 17 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 17 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Names read as Atomic Red Team
Follow Atomic Red Team
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Atomic Red Team is its own company.ShowHide
The company
In its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- An open source library of tests designed to test your organization's security controls.
- For
- security teams
- Free plan or trial
- free and open source tools atomicredteam.io
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, integrations, certifications, hosting, customers
What Atomic Red Team's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: atomicredteam.io. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Atomic Red Team's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Atomic Red Team, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Atomic Red Team by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Atomic Red Team is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Atomic Red Team, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.