Threat intelligence platforms · October 2026 Edition
AlienVault OTX vs Cyble Vision
Zero of fourteen models named AlienVault OTX first on the direct prompt; two named Cyble Vision. AlienVault OTX was named by seven of the fourteen models and Cyble Vision by eight and AlienVault OTX carries 11 labels and Cyble Vision 13, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in two categories this edition.
First-choice share5%5%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate0%15%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#6#7A position in a field of 14; printed, not drawn.
Labels1113A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, AlienVault OTX reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.ThreatConnect was named alongside these two in eight of the fourteen direct answers. MISP vs AlienVault OTX · MISP vs Cyble Vision · Recorded Future Intelligence Cloud vs AlienVault OTX
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the threat intelligence platforms page.
By framing
How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
AlienVault OTXFirst choices, of fourteen modelsCyble Vision
Direct02
Paraphrase10
Comparative01
Budget-constrained201 against Cyble Vision
Scale-constrained01
Negative001 against Cyble Vision
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.
Every model, every framing
The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where AlienVault OTX and Cyble Vision stood in it.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | | |||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | ||||
| Perplexity Sonar | | | ||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | | ||||
| Mistral Small | | | ||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | ||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | ||||||
| Kimi K2 | ||||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | ||||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | |
AlienVault OTX Cyble Vision first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, AlienVault OTX on the left and Cyble Vision on the right.The direct prompt
The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where AlienVault OTX and Cyble Vision stood in it.
Cyble Vision first, AlienVault OTX not the choice
2 of 14 modelsAlienVault OTX was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Mistral SmallCyble Vision, Rapid7 Threat Command alternatives: UpGuard
DeepSeek V4 FlashCyble Vision, Rapid7 Threat Command alternatives: Anomali ThreatStream, CrowdStrike Falcon, NordStellar, OpenCTI
Neither was the first choice, one was named
2 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Claude Haiku 4.5Recorded Future Intelligence Cloud alternatives: CloudSEK, CrowdStrike Falcon, Cyble Vision, Mandiant Threat Intelligence
Muse Glimmer 30BUpGuard alternatives: Cyble Vision, ThreatConnect
Neither was named
10 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.GPT-5.4 miniRecorded Future Intelligence Cloud alternatives: Anomali ThreatStream, ThreatConnect
Gemini 3.5 FlashFlare, SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence alternatives: CrowdStrike Falcon Intelligence, UpGuard
Perplexity SonarSOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence alternatives: Flare, Rapid7 Threat Command, ThreatConnect
Grok 4.1 FastCrowdStrike Falcon Intelligence alternatives: Anomali ThreatStream, Flashpoint Ignite, ManageEngine Log360, Recorded Future Intelligence Cloud, ThreatConnect
Llama 4 Maverickno first choice
Qwen 3.7 FlashThreatConnect alternatives: ManageEngine Log360, UpGuard
Kimi K2Anomali ThreatStream, ThreatConnect alternatives: Google Threat Intelligence, NordStellar
GLM 4.7 FlashXRecorded Future Intelligence Cloud, ThreatSearch alternatives: Anomali ThreatStream, ThreatConnect
MiniMax M2.5Rapid7 Threat Command alternatives: ManageEngine Log360, UpGuard
GPT-6 LunaRecorded Future Intelligence Cloud alternatives: Anomali ThreatStream, ThreatConnect
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
AlienVault OTX leads by fourteen points.
AlienVault OTX14%#2 of 14Cyble Vision0%#– of 14Mid-marketThe figures above
Level: the same share of first choices.
AlienVault OTX5%#6 of 14Cyble Vision5%#7 of 14Enterprise
The order flips: Cyble Vision leads at enterprise.
Cyble Vision2%#– of 11AlienVault OTX0%#– of 11What the models said about AlienVault OTX
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.
“I'd recommend starting with AlienVault OTX (Open Threat Exchange) as your primary cyber threat intelligence (CTI) feed.” Grok 4.1 Fast · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Start with AlienVault OTX (free) for your primary threat intelligence feed” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
“I'd recommend starting with a free platform like OTX or abuse.ch” Claude Haiku 4.5 · budget prompt · first choice
What the models said about Cyble Vision
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of five in this category shown.
“Cyble received criticism for: Duplicate notifications and unreliable alert delivery → alert fatigue, Poor customer support” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“positioned for larger teams or come with custom pricing, so they are usually not the best first pick when budget is constrained” Perplexity Sonar · budget prompt · soft negative
“Cyble Vision ranks first for combining external threat intelligence, dark web monitoring, attack surface management, and brand protection into a single AI-native platform.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · comparative prompt · first choice
“prioritize platforms that offer Extended Threat Intelligence (XTI) or Brand/Identity protection (like SOCRadar, Flare, or Cyble)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · scale prompt · first choice
“Rapid7 Threat Command and Cyble Vision are the strongest overall picks” DeepSeek V4 Flash · direct prompt · first choice
Also compared
MISP vs AlienVault OTXMISP vs Cyble VisionRecorded Future Intelligence Cloud vs AlienVault OTXRecorded Future Intelligence Cloud vs Cyble VisionAnomali ThreatStream vs AlienVault OTXAnomali ThreatStream vs Cyble VisionSOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence vs AlienVault OTXSOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence vs Cyble VisionThreatConnect vs AlienVault OTXThreatConnect vs Cyble VisionAlienVault OTX vs CrowdStrike Falcon IntelligenceCyble Vision vs CrowdStrike Falcon IntelligenceAll twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full threat intel standing
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.