AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Security operations › DSPM › Microsoft Purview vs Securiti
Data security posture management · October 2026 Edition

Microsoft Purview vs Securiti

Zero of fourteen models named Microsoft Purview first on the direct prompt; one named Securiti. Microsoft Purview was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and Securiti by eleven and Microsoft Purview carries 37 labels and Securiti 16, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Microsoft Purview

accepted challenger

Named in nine categories this edition.

Securiti

accepted challenger

Named in two categories this edition.

First-choice share18%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate11%0%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#1#8A position in a field of 12; printed, not drawn.
Labels3716A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Microsoft Purview reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Cyera was named alongside these two in twelve of the fourteen direct answers. Microsoft Purview vs Sentra · Microsoft Purview vs Wiz · Microsoft Purview vs Cyera

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the data security posture management page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
Microsoft PurviewFirst choices, of fourteen modelsSecuriti
Direct01
Paraphrase50
Comparative00
Budget-constrained401 against Microsoft Purview
Scale-constrained00
Negative003 against Microsoft Purview
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Microsoft Purview and Securiti stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 Fast
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
Microsoft Purview Securiti first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Microsoft Purview on the left and Securiti on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Microsoft Purview and Securiti stood in it.

Securiti first, Microsoft Purview an alternative

1 of 14 modelsMicrosoft Purview was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
GLM 4.7 FlashXSecuriti, Varonis Data Security Platform alternatives: Cyera, Microsoft Purview

Neither was the first choice, one was named

3 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
GPT-5.4 miniVaronis Data Security Platform alternatives: Microsoft Purview, Teleskope
MiniMax M2.5Cyera, Sentra alternatives: Concentric, Forcepoint DSPM, Microsoft Purview
GPT-6 LunaWiz DSPM alternatives: Cyera, Microsoft Purview, Sentra

Neither was named

10 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Claude Haiku 4.5Cyera alternatives: Netwrix, Normalyze, Sentra
Gemini 3.5 FlashWiz alternatives: CrowdStrike, Cyera, Proofpoint DSPM, Sentra
Perplexity SonarSentra alternatives: Concentric, Cyera, Prisma Cloud DSPM, Wiz
Grok 4.1 FastSentra alternatives: Concentric AI, Cyera, Varonis Data Security Platform
Mistral SmallSentra alternatives: Concentric, Cyera
DeepSeek V4 FlashSentra alternatives: Concentric AI, Cyera
Llama 4 MaverickConcentric, Cyera, Sentra
Qwen 3.7 FlashWiz alternatives: Cyera, Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Orca Security
Kimi K2Wiz alternatives: BigID, Varonis Data Security Platform
Muse Glimmer 30BSentra alternatives: Concentric AI, Cyera

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Microsoft Purview leads by thirty-five points.
Microsoft Purview36%#1 of 12
Securiti2%#8 of 12
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Microsoft Purview leads by sixteen points.
Microsoft Purview18%#1 of 12
Securiti2%#8 of 12
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Microsoft Purview leads by twelve points.
Microsoft Purview14%#4 of 11
Securiti2%#5 of 11
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Microsoft Purview

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of three in this category shown.

“is outstanding for Microsoft-heavy environments ... but is notoriously limited when dealing with AWS, GCP, or non-Microsoft SaaS applications” Gemini 3.5 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“organizations that don't already have M365 E5 licensing will find that advanced DSPM capabilities come at significant additional cost” Claude Haiku 4.5 · budget prompt · soft negative
“Start with Microsoft Purview Suite ($10-12/user/month) if you're already in the Microsoft ecosystem—it offers the best balance of features, support, and predictable costs.” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · first choice

What the models said about Securiti

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.

“I'd recommend starting with Securiti or Varonis” GLM 4.7 FlashX · direct prompt · first choice
“If you need privacy compliance + broad data governance → BigID or Securiti” DeepSeek V4 Flash · comparative prompt · alternative
“Knowledge graph architecture, unified data governance, AI governance” Kimi K2 · comparative prompt · alternative
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.