Index › IT operations and endpoint › Endpoint protection › SentinelOne Singularity vs SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint
Endpoint protection · October 2026 Edition
SentinelOne Singularity vs SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint
One of fourteen models named SentinelOne Singularity first on the direct prompt; zero named SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint. SentinelOne Singularity was named by eleven of the fourteen models and SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint by nine and SentinelOne Singularity carries 25 labels and SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint 22, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in fourteen categories this edition.
Named in two categories this edition.
First-choice share5%3%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate0%9%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#6#7A position in a field of 11; printed, not drawn.
Labels2522A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, SentinelOne Singularity reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Sophos Intercept X was named alongside these two in ten of the fourteen direct answers. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs SentinelOne Singularity · Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint · Bitdefender GravityZone vs SentinelOne Singularity
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the endpoint protection page.
By framing
How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
SentinelOne SingularityFirst choices, of fourteen modelsSentinelOne Singularity Endpoint
Direct10
Paraphrase20
Comparative23
Budget-constrained001 against SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint
Scale-constrained02
Negative001 against SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.
Every model, every framing
The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where SentinelOne Singularity and SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint stood in it.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | |||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | ||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | | |
| Perplexity Sonar | | | ||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | | | | | |
| Mistral Small | | |||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | ||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | | | |
| Kimi K2 | | | | |||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | ||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-6 Luna | | | ||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | | | |
SentinelOne Singularity SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, SentinelOne Singularity on the left and SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint on the right.The direct prompt
The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where SentinelOne Singularity and SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint stood in it.
SentinelOne Singularity first, SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint not the choice
1 of 14 modelsSentinelOne Singularity Endpoint was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.DeepSeek V4 FlashSentinelOne Singularity alternatives: Bitdefender GravityZone, CrowdStrike Falcon, Microsoft Defender for Business / Endpoint, Sophos Intercept X
Neither was the first choice, one was named
8 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.GPT-5.4 miniCrowdStrike Falcon alternatives: Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint, Sophos Intercept X
Gemini 3.5 FlashSophos Intercept X alternatives: Huntress Managed EDR, Microsoft Defender for Business / Defender for Endpoint, SentinelOne Singularity
Perplexity SonarBitdefender GravityZone alternatives: CrowdStrike Falcon, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, SentinelOne Singularity, Sophos Intercept X
Grok 4.1 FastMicrosoft Defender for Endpoint alternatives: Bitdefender GravityZone, SentinelOne Singularity, Sophos Intercept X
Qwen 3.7 FlashMicrosoft Defender for Endpoint alternatives: CrowdStrike Falcon, SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint, Sophos Intercept X, Trend Vision One
Kimi K2Microsoft Defender for Endpoint alternatives: Bitdefender GravityZone, CrowdStrike Falcon, SentinelOne Singularity
GPT-6 LunaCrowdStrike Falcon alternatives: Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, SentinelOne Singularity
Muse Glimmer 30BBitdefender GravityZone Business Security, Microsoft Defender for Business / Defender for Endpoint alternatives: CrowdStrike Falcon, SentinelOne Singularity, Sophos Intercept X
Neither was named
5 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Claude Haiku 4.5Sophos Intercept X alternatives: Bitdefender GravityZone, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Palo Alto Networks Cortex XDR
Mistral SmallBitdefender GravityZone, CrowdStrike Falcon alternatives: Acronis Cyber Protect
Llama 4 MaverickBitdefender GravityZone
GLM 4.7 FlashXCrowdStrike Falcon alternatives: Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Sophos Intercept X
MiniMax M2.5Bitdefender GravityZone, CrowdStrike Falcon alternatives: Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Sophos Intercept X
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint leads by two points.
SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint2%#7 of 12SentinelOne Singularity0%#10 of 12Mid-marketThe figures above
The order flips: SentinelOne Singularity leads at mid-market.
SentinelOne Singularity5%#6 of 11SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint3%#7 of 11Enterprise
SentinelOne Singularity leads by seven points.
SentinelOne Singularity7%#3 of 9SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint0%#8 of 9What the models said about SentinelOne Singularity
No label in this category carried a quote.
What the models said about SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of six in this category shown.
“Examples in review data include SentinelOne and FortiEDR complaints about false positives and exclusion management.” GPT-5.4 mini · negative prompt · soft negative
“buying a tool like SentinelOne or CrowdStrike to manage yourself can result in "alert fatigue"” Gemini 3.5 Flash · budget prompt · soft negative
“SentinelOne (Singularity): Excellent for mid-market. Highly automated, strong local machine learning (works offline), and includes a famous "Rollback" feature” Gemini 3.5 Flash · scale prompt · first choice
“CrowdStrike Falcon and SentinelOne Singularity remain the two strongest all-around endpoint security platforms” Claude Haiku 4.5 · comparative prompt · first choice
“Choose SentinelOne if you want the technology to run itself with minimum manual effort.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice
Also compared
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs SentinelOne SingularityMicrosoft Defender for Endpoint vs SentinelOne Singularity EndpointBitdefender GravityZone vs SentinelOne SingularityBitdefender GravityZone vs SentinelOne Singularity EndpointMicrosoft Defender for Cloud vs SentinelOne SingularityMicrosoft Defender for Cloud vs SentinelOne Singularity EndpointCrowdStrike Falcon vs SentinelOne SingularityCrowdStrike Falcon vs SentinelOne Singularity EndpointSophos Intercept X vs SentinelOne SingularitySophos Intercept X vs SentinelOne Singularity EndpointSentinelOne Singularity vs ESET PROTECTSentinelOne Singularity Endpoint vs ESET PROTECTAll twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full endpoint protection standing
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.