Microsegmentation · October 2026 Edition
Illumio Segmentation vs Zero Networks Segment
Three of fourteen models named Illumio Segmentation first on the direct prompt; zero named Zero Networks Segment. Illumio Segmentation was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and Zero Networks Segment by thirteen and Illumio Segmentation carries 55 labels and Zero Networks Segment 31, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in one category this edition.
First-choice share20%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate24%6%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#2#5A position in a field of 9; printed, not drawn.
Labels5531A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Illumio Segmentation reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.ColorTokens Xshield was named alongside these two in twelve of the fourteen direct answers. ColorTokens Xshield vs Illumio Segmentation · ColorTokens Xshield vs Zero Networks Segment · Illumio Segmentation vs Akamai Guardicore Segmentation
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the microsegmentation page.
By framing
How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
Illumio SegmentationFirst choices, of fourteen modelsZero Networks Segment
Direct301 against Illumio Segmentation
Paraphrase412 against Illumio Segmentation
Comparative1101 against Zero Networks Segment
Budget-constrained003 against Illumio Segmentation
Scale-constrained40
Negative117 against Illumio Segmentation · 1 against Zero Networks Segment
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.
Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, Illumio Segmentation and Zero Networks Segment were named in the same answer seventy-seven times, of the 169 answers naming Illumio Segmentation and the 95 naming Zero Networks Segment. In those answers Zero Networks Segment took the first choice thirteen times and Illumio Segmentation forty.
Every model, every framing
The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Illumio Segmentation and Zero Networks Segment stood in it.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | | | ||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | | |
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | |||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | | | | | |
| Mistral Small | | | | | ||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | ||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | | ||
| Kimi K2 | | | | | ||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | |||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | | | | |
| GPT-6 Luna | | | | |||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | | | | |
Illumio Segmentation Zero Networks Segment first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Illumio Segmentation on the left and Zero Networks Segment on the right.The direct prompt
The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Illumio Segmentation and Zero Networks Segment stood in it.
Illumio Segmentation first, Zero Networks Segment an alternative
3 of 14 modelsZero Networks Segment was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.GPT-5.4 miniIllumio Segmentation alternatives: Akamai Guardicore Segmentation, Zero Networks Segment
Qwen 3.7 FlashAkamai Guardicore Segmentation, Illumio Segmentation alternatives: ColorTokens Xshield
GPT-6 LunaIllumio Segmentation alternatives: Akamai Guardicore Segmentation, Cisco Secure Workload
Neither was the first choice, one was named
9 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Claude Haiku 4.5ColorTokens Xshield alternatives: Akamai Guardicore Segmentation, Cisco Secure Workload, Illumio Segmentation, Zero Networks Segment
Gemini 3.5 FlashColorTokens Xshield alternatives: 6sense, Faddom, HubSpot, SideChannel, Zero Networks Segment
Perplexity SonarColorTokens Xshield, Zscaler Private Access alternatives: Akamai Guardicore Segmentation, Cisco Secure Workload, Illumio Segmentation
Grok 4.1 FastColorTokens Xshield alternatives: Akamai Guardicore Segmentation, Illumio Segmentation, Zscaler Private Access
Mistral SmallColorTokens Xshield alternatives: Akamai Guardicore Segmentation, Elisity, Illumio Segmentation
DeepSeek V4 FlashColorTokens Xshield alternatives: Akamai Guardicore Segmentation, Illumio Segmentation
GLM 4.7 FlashXColorTokens Xshield alternatives: Akamai Guardicore Segmentation, Illumio Segmentation
MiniMax M2.5ColorTokens Xshield alternatives: Illumio Segmentation
Muse Glimmer 30BColorTokens Xshield alternatives: Akamai Guardicore Segmentation, Cisco Secure Workload, formerly Tetration, Illumio Segmentation
Neither was named
2 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Llama 4 MaverickColorTokens Xshield
Kimi K2ColorTokens Xshield alternatives: Akamai Guardicore Segmentation, SideChannel Enclave
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Zero Networks Segment leads by four points.
Zero Networks Segment16%#1 of 10Illumio Segmentation12%#2 of 10Mid-marketThe figures above
The order flips: Illumio Segmentation leads at mid-market.
Illumio Segmentation20%#2 of 9Zero Networks Segment2%#5 of 9Enterprise
Illumio Segmentation leads by fifty-four points.
Illumio Segmentation56%#1 of 9Zero Networks Segment2%#6 of 9What the models said about Illumio Segmentation
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“host agent-based solutions (like some older versions of Illumio, Guardicore, ColorTokens, or TrueFort) can be effective, they require deploying and maintaining agents on every workload” Mistral Small · negative prompt · soft negative
“While technologies like Illumio or Guardicore use this effectively, you should be cautious if your environment has strict stability requirements” Qwen 3.7 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“Illumio's core enforcement still requires an agent on every workload... unmanaged OT and IoT devices only receiving monitoring, not enforcement.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · negative prompt · soft negative
“If you want workload-centric segmentation across hybrid cloud with label-based policy and no inline appliances, Illumio is the reference.” Muse Glimmer 30B · comparative prompt · first choice
“Illumio (or Cisco Secure Workload if you're already Cisco‑shop) gives you the most granular, automated policy model.” MiniMax M2.5 · comparative prompt · first choice
“Choose Illumio if you want the clearest policy-by-label model and strong visual mapping of workload communication.” Perplexity Sonar · comparative prompt · first choice
What the models said about Zero Networks Segment
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of six in this category shown.
“Zero Networks' MFA-centric model may not suit every environment... with Kubernetes segmentation still maturing.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · negative prompt · soft negative
“Emerging; less mature integrations” Grok 4.1 Fast · comparative prompt · soft negative
“Prioritize modern, identity/label-based tools (e.g., Calico for K8s, Zero Networks for simplicity)” Grok 4.1 Fast · negative prompt · first choice
“I recommend Zero Networks.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Zero Networks (Runner-Up) - Best if: Your company is cloud-heavy or you want zero-trust segmentation” GLM 4.7 FlashX · paraphrase prompt · alternative
Also compared
ColorTokens Xshield vs Illumio SegmentationColorTokens Xshield vs Zero Networks SegmentIllumio Segmentation vs Akamai Guardicore SegmentationIllumio Segmentation vs FaddomIllumio Segmentation vs Zscaler Private AccessIllumio Segmentation vs VMware NSXAkamai Guardicore Segmentation vs Zero Networks SegmentFaddom vs Zero Networks SegmentZero Networks Segment vs Zscaler Private AccessZero Networks Segment vs VMware NSXAll twenty-one head-to-head pages and the full microsegmentation standing
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.