Microsegmentation · October 2026 Edition
Illumio Segmentation vs Faddom
Three of fourteen models named Illumio Segmentation first on the direct prompt; zero named Faddom. Illumio Segmentation was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and Faddom by nine and Illumio Segmentation carries 55 labels and Faddom 11, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in two categories this edition.
First-choice share20%5%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate24%9%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#2#4A position in a field of 9; printed, not drawn.
Labels5511A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Illumio Segmentation reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.ColorTokens Xshield was named alongside these two in twelve of the fourteen direct answers. ColorTokens Xshield vs Illumio Segmentation · ColorTokens Xshield vs Faddom · Illumio Segmentation vs Akamai Guardicore Segmentation
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the microsegmentation page.
By framing
How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
Illumio SegmentationFirst choices, of fourteen modelsFaddom
Direct301 against Illumio Segmentation · 1 against Faddom
Paraphrase402 against Illumio Segmentation
Comparative110
Budget-constrained033 against Illumio Segmentation
Scale-constrained40
Negative107 against Illumio Segmentation
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.
Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, Illumio Segmentation and Faddom were named in the same answer twenty-one times, of the 169 answers naming Illumio Segmentation and the 39 naming Faddom. In those answers Faddom took the first choice six times and Illumio Segmentation one.
Every model, every framing
The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Illumio Segmentation and Faddom stood in it.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | | |||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | | | ||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | | |
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | |||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | | | | ||
| Mistral Small | | | | | ||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | | |
| Llama 4 Maverick | | |||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | |||
| Kimi K2 | | | | | | |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | |||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | | | | |
| GPT-6 Luna | | | | |||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | | | | |
Illumio Segmentation Faddom first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Illumio Segmentation on the left and Faddom on the right.The direct prompt
The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Illumio Segmentation and Faddom stood in it.
Illumio Segmentation first, Faddom not the choice
3 of 14 modelsFaddom was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.GPT-5.4 miniIllumio Segmentation alternatives: Akamai Guardicore Segmentation, Zero Networks Segment
Qwen 3.7 FlashAkamai Guardicore Segmentation, Illumio Segmentation alternatives: ColorTokens Xshield
GPT-6 LunaIllumio Segmentation alternatives: Akamai Guardicore Segmentation, Cisco Secure Workload
Neither was the first choice, one was named
9 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Claude Haiku 4.5ColorTokens Xshield alternatives: Akamai Guardicore Segmentation, Cisco Secure Workload, Illumio Segmentation, Zero Networks Segment
Gemini 3.5 FlashColorTokens Xshield alternatives: 6sense, Faddom, HubSpot, SideChannel, Zero Networks Segment
Perplexity SonarColorTokens Xshield, Zscaler Private Access alternatives: Akamai Guardicore Segmentation, Cisco Secure Workload, Illumio Segmentation
Grok 4.1 FastColorTokens Xshield alternatives: Akamai Guardicore Segmentation, Illumio Segmentation, Zscaler Private Access
Mistral SmallColorTokens Xshield alternatives: Akamai Guardicore Segmentation, Elisity, Illumio Segmentation
DeepSeek V4 FlashColorTokens Xshield alternatives: Akamai Guardicore Segmentation, Illumio Segmentation
GLM 4.7 FlashXColorTokens Xshield alternatives: Akamai Guardicore Segmentation, Illumio Segmentation
MiniMax M2.5ColorTokens Xshield alternatives: Illumio Segmentation
Muse Glimmer 30BColorTokens Xshield alternatives: Akamai Guardicore Segmentation, Cisco Secure Workload, formerly Tetration, Illumio Segmentation
Neither was named
2 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Llama 4 MaverickColorTokens Xshield
Kimi K2ColorTokens Xshield alternatives: Akamai Guardicore Segmentation, SideChannel Enclave
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Illumio Segmentation leads by six points.
Illumio Segmentation12%#2 of 10Faddom6%#3 of 10Mid-marketThe figures above
Illumio Segmentation leads by fourteen points.
Illumio Segmentation20%#2 of 9Faddom5%#4 of 9Enterprise
Faddom is not named for this buyer.
Illumio Segmentation56%#1 of 9Faddom—not namedWhat the models said about Illumio Segmentation
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“host agent-based solutions (like some older versions of Illumio, Guardicore, ColorTokens, or TrueFort) can be effective, they require deploying and maintaining agents on every workload” Mistral Small · negative prompt · soft negative
“While technologies like Illumio or Guardicore use this effectively, you should be cautious if your environment has strict stability requirements” Qwen 3.7 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“Illumio's core enforcement still requires an agent on every workload... unmanaged OT and IoT devices only receiving monitoring, not enforcement.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · negative prompt · soft negative
“If you want workload-centric segmentation across hybrid cloud with label-based policy and no inline appliances, Illumio is the reference.” Muse Glimmer 30B · comparative prompt · first choice
“Illumio (or Cisco Secure Workload if you're already Cisco‑shop) gives you the most granular, automated policy model.” MiniMax M2.5 · comparative prompt · first choice
“Choose Illumio if you want the clearest policy-by-label model and strong visual mapping of workload communication.” Perplexity Sonar · comparative prompt · first choice
What the models said about Faddom
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.
“Mapping only, not full enforcement” DeepSeek V4 Flash · direct prompt · soft negative
“The best microsegmentation solution for a company with a limited budget is Faddom, which is a budget-friendly dependency mapping tool.” Llama 4 Maverick · budget prompt · first choice
“For a company with limited budget, I'd recommend starting with Faddom” MiniMax M2.5 · budget prompt · first choice
“start with Enclave (free) or Faddom (low-cost)” Mistral Small · budget prompt · first choice
Also compared
ColorTokens Xshield vs Illumio SegmentationColorTokens Xshield vs FaddomIllumio Segmentation vs Akamai Guardicore SegmentationIllumio Segmentation vs Zero Networks SegmentIllumio Segmentation vs Zscaler Private AccessIllumio Segmentation vs VMware NSXAkamai Guardicore Segmentation vs FaddomFaddom vs Zero Networks SegmentFaddom vs Zscaler Private AccessFaddom vs VMware NSXAll twenty-one head-to-head pages and the full microsegmentation standing
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.