Five of twelve models named Microsoft Entra ID first on the direct prompt; two named Okta. Both were named by all twelve models and Microsoft Entra ID carries 63 labels and Okta 36, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in eight categories this edition.
Named in five categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the Workforce identity and SSO page.
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of six in this category shown.
“Caution: Microsoft's deep integration creates significant vendor lock-in risk, and the platform's complexity leads to frequent misconfigurations.” Kimi K2 · negative prompt · soft negative
“Microsoft's identity platform has also faced vulnerabilities: Critical Vulnerabilities... multiple critical CVSS 10.0 vulnerabilities” MiniMax M2.5 · negative prompt · soft negative
“it can be less polished outside of it. Advanced governance and identity protection features are often locked behind higher-tier plans” Mistral Small · negative prompt · soft negative
“Choose Microsoft Entra ID if you are already a Microsoft-centric shop; the financial integration and native OS/security synergy are too strong to ignore.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice
“Leaders to Prioritize (Lower Relative Risk): Microsoft Entra ID (ecosystem lock-in but top execution in Gartner/Forrester; watch non-MS integrations)” Grok 4.1 Fast · negative prompt · first choice
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of six in this category shown.
“Avoid Okta if budget is a primary concern” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · hard negative
“it has had past security incidents, and its governance and lifecycle capabilities often require additional modules. Pricing can also become complex as deployments scale” Mistral Small · negative prompt · soft negative
“Caution: While Okta remains a major player, the repeated security incidents suggest systemic issues with their security posture.” Kimi K2 · negative prompt · soft negative
“Okta Workforce Identity Cloud: The gold standard for vendor-neutral, best-of-breed SaaS environments. Highly powerful and scales infinitely, though it can get expensive.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · scale prompt · first choice
“Okta is the best overall workforce identity platform due to its comprehensive features, scalability, and integration capabilities.” Mistral Small · direct prompt · first choice
“Best for enterprises wanting a best-of-breed, vendor-neutral identity platform... Okta leads in third-party integrations” Mistral Small · comparative prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top three products in each category. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.