Small business▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 16 → 13 of 71
Vonahi · 1 category · Named, not rankedVonahi Security vPenTest
11Judge labels
2First choices
0Negative labels
6 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
4 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Vonahi Security vPenTest was named 4 times in PTaaS, where Cobalt led with 45%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business14 of 76
2%4 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market9 of 82
2%4 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprisenot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
In ptaas · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Vonahi Security vPenTest for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Penetration testing as a service | Security operations | 2% | 9 of 82 | 0% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by Cobalt at 45% | =heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Vonahi Security vPenTest held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · PTaaS · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 11 → 9 of 74
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PTaaS | 2% | 2% | =heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 11 → 9 of 82 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Vonahi Security vPenTest across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Vonahi Security vPenTest across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase2 labelsNone
Comparative2 labelsNone
Budget-constrained5 labels2
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative1 label1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative11 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Best value for most small businesses: a PTaaS / automated-hybrid service like vPenTest or Astra Pentest” GPT-5.4 mini · PTaaS · budget prompt · first choice
“Provides continuous penetration testing on a quarterly schedule, which helps spread the cost over the year” Mistral Small · PTaaS · budget prompt · alternative
“Best for Automated Network Pentests: vPenTest (by Vonahi Security)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · PTaaS · budget prompt · alternative
“Good for MSPs and SMBs needing network tests” Kimi K2 · PTaaS · budget prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Vonahi Security vPenTest, over the 11 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Vonahi Security vPenTest was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Vonahi Security vPenTest, over the 11 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Vonahi Security vPenTest was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Vonahi Security vPenTest. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 11 of the 11 answers that named Vonahi Security vPenTest and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
reddit.com6
g2.com5
synack.com5
complyjet.com4
stingrai.io4
gartner.com3
getastra.com3
startupstash.com3
underdefense.com3
vonahi.ioYour site3
Thirty-six of the thirty-nine domain citations in answers naming Vonahi Security vPenTest came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Names read as Vonahi Security vPenTest
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Vonahi Security vPenTest; a claim can dispute any of them.
vPenTest 2Vonahi Security (vPenTest) 1vPenTest (by Vonahi Security) 1
Follow Vonahi Security vPenTest
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Vonahi is the company behind Vonahi Security vPenTest.ShowHide
The company
Vonahi is the company behind Vonahi Security vPenTest.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Automate Network PenTesting with vPenTest
- For
- businesses
- Free plan or trial
- SCHEDULE A FREE DEMO blog.vonahi.io/the-8-types-of-penetration-testing
- Certifications
- SOC2PCI DSSHIPAA
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, integrations, hosting, customers
What Vonahi Security vPenTest's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: blog.vonahi.io/the-8-types-of-penetration-testing, blog.vonahi.io/penetration-testing-on-a-new-level, blog.vonahi.io/penetration-test-vs-vulnerability-assessment, blog.vonahi.io/why-your-organization-needs-a-penetration-test, blog.vonahi.io/vpentest-received-9-badges-in-fall-2023-from-g2. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Vonahi Security vPenTest's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Vonahi Security vPenTest, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Vonahi Security vPenTest by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Vonahi Security vPenTest is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Vonahi Security vPenTest, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.