IT AI Index

Index › Products › Redgate Data Masker · October 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Redgate Data Masker

5Judge labels

0First choices

1Negative labels

2 / 14Models named it

1Category

October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

2 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Redgate Data Masker was named 2 times in Data masking, where DATPROF led with 17%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business75 of 152

under the label threshold

Mid-market36 of 140

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In data masking · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Redgate Data Masker for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Data masking and test data management	Data platform	0%	36 of 140	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by DATPROF at 17%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Redgate Data Masker yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Redgate Data Masker across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	1	1
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct2 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative1 labelNone

Budget-constrained2 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative5 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Mostly SQL Server or Oracle: evaluate Redgate Data Masker first.” GPT-6 Luna · Data masking · direct prompt · alternative

“A cost-effective commercial option designed for simplicity” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Data masking · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Redgate Data Masker, over the 5 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Redgate Data Masker was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Greenmask3 of 51Not among the top eight

Tonic Structural2 of 52Not among the top eight

PostgreSQL Anonymizer2 of 51Not among the top eight

Tonic.ai2 of 50Not among the top eight

DataVeil1 of 51Not among the top eight

Microsoft Presidio1 of 51Not among the top eight

ARX1 of 50Not among the top eight

Bytebase1 of 50Not among the top eight

DBHawk1 of 50Not among the top eight

DataMasker1 of 50Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Redgate Data Masker. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 5 of the 5 answers that named Redgate Data Masker and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

red-gate.comYour site4

learn.microsoft.com3

tonic.ai3

fivetran.com2

github.com2

hevodata.com2

itechguides.com2

securityboulevard.com2

softwaretestinghelp.com2

us.fitgap.com2

Twenty of the twenty-four domain citations in answers naming Redgate Data Masker came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

red-gate.com/products/data-masker4

learn.microsoft.com/en-us/sql/relational-databases/security/dynamic-data-masking3

fivetran.com/learn/data-masking-software2

github.com/topics/data-masking2

hevodata.com/learn/data-masking-tools2

softwaretestinghelp.com/data-masking-tools2

tonic.ai/blog/evaluating-open-source-tools-data-masking2

bestdevops.com/top-10-data-masking-tools-in-2025-features-pros-cons-comparison1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on red-gate.com

4,813

subdomains included

Content

2,320

counted in the table below

Documentation

Product · Integration

253 · 2

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest	Categories named
Blog	1,419	undated		Data catalogs, AI coding
Case study	594	undated		Data catalogs
Conference or event	192	undated		Data catalogs
Glossary or explainer	46	undated		Data catalogs
Report or ebook	22	0	2025-06-05
Comparison	22	undated		NoSQL
Webinar or virtual event	17	undated
Template or tool	4	undated
News or press	4	undated

Most recent

2025-06-05Add new custom metric wizard summary report or ebook
2017-07-27Writing a metric enter alert details 3 report or ebook
2017-06-13Using a metric create metric report or ebook
2017-06-13Using a metric install metric report or ebook
2017-06-13Writing a metric enter custom metric details report or ebook
2017-06-13Writing a metric enter the t sql query report or ebook

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page red-gate.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Of its titles that name a category, most name data catalogs (17); 0 name the category the models place it in. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.

Follow Redgate Data Masker

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Redgate Data Masker is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Certifications: ISO 27001:2022
Not stated on the pages read: Positioning, who it is for, price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, hosting, customers

What Redgate Data Masker's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: red-gate.com, red-gate.com/trust, red-gate.com/products, red-gate.com/customers, red-gate.com/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Redgate Data Masker's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Redgate Data Masker, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Redgate Data Masker by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Redgate Data Masker is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Redgate Data Masker, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.