IT AI Index

Index › Vendors › MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager · September 2026 Edition

MuleSoft · 2 categories · Named, not ranked

MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager

2Judge labels

0First choices

2Negative labels

1 of 12Models named it

2Categories

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

2 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager was named 2 times in API gateways and 1 other category, where Kong Gateway led with 61%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small businessnot named

No model named it for this buyer.

Mid-market46 of 51

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In api gateways · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
API gateways	Developer platform	0%	46 of 51	100%	1	under 10 labels · led by Kong Gateway at 61%
API management	Developer platform	0%	48 of 55	100%	1	under 10 labels · led by Kong Gateway at 37%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	2	2
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative2 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative2 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Avoid: MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager (for cost and operational complexity)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · API gateways · negative prompt · hard negative

“Cost is the #1 recurring complaint. vCore-based pricing is notoriously opaque ... Proprietary lock-in: DataWeave transformations and the Anypoint architecture lock you in hard.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · API management · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager, over the 2 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Amazon API Gateway2 of 20Not in the top three

Apigee2 of 20Not in the top three

Kong Gateway2 of 20Not in the top three

Apache APISIX1 of 20Not in the top three

Azure API Management1 of 20Not in the top three

Emissary1 of 20Not in the top three

Traefik1 of 20Not in the top three

Tyk1 of 20Not in the top three

WSO2 API Manager1 of 20Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 2 of the 2 answers that named MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

g2.com2

peerspot.com2

reddit.com2

accuknox.com1

apim.docs.wso2.com1

app.opencve.io1

aws.amazon.com1

bubble.ro1

checkthat.ai1

cloud.google.com1

Thirteen of the thirteen domain citations in answers naming MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

peerspot.com/questions/what-is-your-experience-regarding-pricing-and-costs-for-mulesoft-an2

accuknox.com/blog/best-api-security-tools-20261

apim.docs.wso2.com/en/4.5.0/troubleshooting/error-handling1

app.opencve.io/cve1

aws.amazon.com/marketplace/reviews/reviews-list/prodview-qwksr2wun4awo1

bubble.ro/2026/07/05/api-gateway-tips-tricks-and-the-gotchas-nobody-warns-you-about1

checkthat.ai/brands/apigee/alternatives1

cloud.google.com/apigee/docs/deprecations1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at mulesoft.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.