IT AI Index

Index › Vendors › BeyondTrust Retina · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

BeyondTrust Retina

1Judge labels

0First choices

1Negative labels

1 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

1 label, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. BeyondTrust Retina was named 1 time in Vuln management, where Rapid7 InsightVM led with 45%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small businessnot named

No model named it for this buyer.

Mid-market77 of 80

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In vuln management · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named BeyondTrust Retina for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Vulnerability management platforms	Security operations	0%	77 of 80	100%	1	under 10 labels · led by Rapid7 InsightVM at 45%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for BeyondTrust Retina yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated BeyondTrust Retina across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative1 labelNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative1 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Officially end-of-life as of Dec 31, 2020, with no further signature updates. Avoid entirely.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Vuln management · negative prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as BeyondTrust Retina, over the 1 answer that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and BeyondTrust Retina was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Cisco Vulnerability Management1 of 10Not in the top three

Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management1 of 10Not in the top three

OWASP ZAP1 of 10Not in the top three

OpenVAS1 of 10Not in the top three

Qualys1 of 10Not in the top three

Rapid7 Nexpose1 of 10Not in the top three

Tenable Nessus1 of 10Not in the top three

Trivy1 of 10Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named BeyondTrust Retina. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 1 of the 1 answers that named BeyondTrust Retina and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

armorcode.com1

axis-intelligence.com1

betanews.com1

binarly.io1

cybervendorguide.com1

def.camp1

dergipark.org.tr1

diva-portal.org1

docs.rapid7.com1

edgescan.com1

Ten of the ten domain citations in answers naming BeyondTrust Retina came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

armorcode.com/blog/kenna-end-of-life-how-to-preserve-independent-vulnerability-management1

armorcode.com/kenna-security-vulnerability-management-eol1

axis-intelligence.com/best-vulnerability-management-tools-tested1

betanews.com/2022/10/26/popular-vulnerability-scanners-are-only-73-percent-accurate1

binarly.io/articles/vulnerability-management-tools1

cybervendorguide.com/guides/vulnerability-management1

def.camp/vulnerability-scanners-benchmarks-pentest-tools1

dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/57402811

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as BeyondTrust Retina

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as BeyondTrust Retina; a claim can dispute any of them.

BeyondTrust Retina (Retina CS / Retina Network Security Scanner) 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when BeyondTrust Retina's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as BeyondTrust Retina, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at beyondtrust.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.