AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › Albumi · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

Albumi

5Judge labels
0First choices
0Negative labels
5 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
2 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Albumi was named 2 times in EA tools, where SAP LeanIX led with 25%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In ea tools · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Albumi for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Enterprise architecture toolsIT operations and endpoint0%31 of 1130%2under 10 labels · led by SAP LeanIX at 25%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Albumi yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Albumi across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K201001
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500101
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative2 labelsNone
Budget-constrained2 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative1 labelNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative5 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“If you need cloud collaboration: Consider Albumi” Kimi K2 · EA tools · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Albumi, over the 5 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Albumi was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Archi4 of 53Not among the top eight
Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect4 of 50Not among the top eight
Bizzdesign Horizzon2 of 50Not among the top eight
BlueDolphin2 of 50Not among the top eight
LeanIX2 of 50Not among the top eight
UrbaHive2 of 50Not among the top eight
Essential Project1 of 51Not among the top eight
Sparx Enterprise Architect1 of 51Not among the top eight
Avolution ABACUS1 of 50Not among the top eight
Bizzdesign Enterprise Studio1 of 50Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Albumi. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 5 of the 5 answers that named Albumi and are not a share of its labels.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on albumi.app
39
subdomains included
Content
19
counted in the table below
Documentation
2
Product · Integration
6 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-11 to 2026-10LatestCategories named
Blog13undatedEA tools
Report or ebook5undatedEA tools
Comparison1undated
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page albumi.app exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read October 5, 2026.

Follow Albumi

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Albumi is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Enterprise architecture management, sized for your team.
For
Enterprise & Solution Architects; Integration Devs · App Owners; Data Stewards · Security Architects; CTOs · Heads of IT
Price stated
Free for up to 3 members. Team $150/mo, Business $500/mo, Enterprise custom - every plan includes every feature. albumi.app
Starting price
150/mo albumi.app
Free plan or trial
Free for up to 3 members albumi.app
Not stated on the pages read
Integrations, certifications, hosting, customers

What Albumi's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: albumi.app, albumi.app/pricing, albumi.app/features. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Albumi's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Albumi, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Albumi by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Albumi is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Albumi, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at albumi.app is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.