AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Security operations › AI SOC agents › Torq vs Intezer AI SOC
AI SOC agents · October 2026 Edition

Torq vs Intezer AI SOC

Zero of fourteen models named Torq first on the direct prompt; zero named Intezer AI SOC. Torq was named by thirteen of the fourteen models and Intezer AI SOC by nine and Torq carries 20 labels and Intezer AI SOC 16, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Torq

accepted challenger

Named in three categories this edition.

Intezer AI SOC

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

First-choice share2%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate5%0%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#5#6A position in a field of 8; printed, not drawn.
Labels2016A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Torq reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Radiant Security was named alongside these two in twelve of the fourteen direct answers. Dropzone AI vs Torq · Dropzone AI vs Intezer AI SOC · Radiant Security vs Torq

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the AI SOC agents page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
TorqFirst choices, of fourteen modelsIntezer AI SOC
Direct001 against Torq
Paraphrase10
Comparative00
Budget-constrained00
Scale-constrained01
Negative00
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, Torq and Intezer AI SOC were named in the same answer twenty-seven times, of the 143 answers naming Torq and the 53 naming Intezer AI SOC. In those answers Intezer AI SOC took the first choice five times and Torq four.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Torq and Intezer AI SOC stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 Fast
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
Torq Intezer AI SOC first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Torq on the left and Intezer AI SOC on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Torq and Intezer AI SOC stood in it.

Neither was the first choice, one was named

3 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Gemini 3.5 FlashDropzone AI alternatives: Intezer AI SOC, Prophet Security, Radiant Security
GLM 4.7 FlashXRadiant Security, UnderDefense MAXI AI SOC alternatives: Dropzone AI, Microsoft Security Copilot, Torq
GPT-6 LunaDropzone AI alternatives: Microsoft Security Copilot, Prophet Security, Torq

Neither was named

11 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Claude Haiku 4.5Radiant Security alternatives: Conifers CognitiveSOC, Dropzone AI, Stellar Cyber Open XDR
GPT-5.4 miniTorq AI SOC Platform alternatives: CrowdStrike Falcon, Google Security Operations, Panther
Perplexity SonarRadiant Security alternatives: Dropzone AI, Stellar Cyber Open XDR
Grok 4.1 FastDropzone AI, Prophet Security, Radiant Security alternatives: Arctic Wolf, Huntress Managed EDR, Microsoft Security Copilot
Mistral SmallRadiant Security, SentinelOne Purple AI
DeepSeek V4 FlashRadiant Security, UnderDefense alternatives: Dropzone AI, Microsoft Security Copilot + Sentinel
Llama 4 MaverickRadiant Security alternatives: SentinelOne Purple AI
Qwen 3.7 FlashSentinelOne Purple AI alternatives: Radiant Security
Kimi K2Radiant Security alternatives: Dropzone AI, Stellar Cyber Open XDR, UnderDefense Agentic AI SOC
MiniMax M2.5UnderDefense MAXI AI SOC alternatives: Radiant Security
Muse Glimmer 30BRadiant Security, UnderDefense

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Intezer AI SOC leads by eight points.
Intezer AI SOC8%#5 of 11
Torq0%#11 of 11
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Level: the same share of first choices.
Torq2%#5 of 8
Intezer AI SOC2%#6 of 8
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Level: the same share of first choices.
Torq9%#3 of 10
Intezer AI SOC9%#2 of 10
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Torq

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. One of one in this category shown.

“What to Avoid: "The Enterprise Giants" ... too heavy and expensive for a lean mid-market team.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · direct prompt · hard negative

What the models said about Intezer AI SOC

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.

“Top picks for your size: UnderDefense, Dropzone AI, or Intezer—strong mid-market validation.” Grok 4.1 Fast · scale prompt · first choice
“Quick setup (30 mins), scalable investigations; parallel processing keeps speed flat under load.” Grok 4.1 Fast · comparative prompt · alternative
“Best If Your Biggest Pain Points Are Malware, Phishing, or Endpoint Alerts” Gemini 3.5 Flash · paraphrase prompt · alternative
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.