Enterprise architecture tools · October 2026 Edition
SAP LeanIX vs Bizzdesign Horizzon
Eight of fourteen models named SAP LeanIX first on the direct prompt; zero named Bizzdesign Horizzon. SAP LeanIX was named by twelve of the fourteen models and Bizzdesign Horizzon by twelve and SAP LeanIX carries 33 labels and Bizzdesign Horizzon 29, so the shares are not directly comparable.
SAP LeanIX
accepted challengerNamed in two categories this edition.
Named in one category this edition.
First-choice share25%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate15%21%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#1#6A position in a field of 10; printed, not drawn.
Labels3329A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, SAP LeanIX reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Ardoq was named alongside these two in twelve of the fourteen direct answers. SAP LeanIX vs Ardoq · SAP LeanIX vs LeanIX · SAP LeanIX vs Archi
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the enterprise architecture tools page.
By framing
How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
SAP LeanIXFirst choices, of fourteen modelsBizzdesign Horizzon
Direct80
Paraphrase30
Comparative61
Budget-constrained101 against SAP LeanIX · 4 against Bizzdesign Horizzon
Scale-constrained211 against SAP LeanIX · 1 against Bizzdesign Horizzon
Negative003 against SAP LeanIX · 1 against Bizzdesign Horizzon
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.
Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, SAP LeanIX and Bizzdesign Horizzon were named in the same answer sixty-five times, of the 119 answers naming SAP LeanIX and the 92 naming Bizzdesign Horizzon. In those answers Bizzdesign Horizzon took the first choice three times and SAP LeanIX twenty-nine.
Every model, every framing
The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where SAP LeanIX and Bizzdesign Horizzon stood in it.
| Model | DirectSL | ParaphraseSL | ComparativeSL | Budget-constrainedSL | Scale-constrainedSL | NegativeSL |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | |||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | SL | SL | SL | |||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | SL | SL | SL | | | |
| Perplexity Sonar | SL | SL | ||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | SL | | | SL | ||
| Mistral Small | ||||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | SL | SL | SL | SL | | SL |
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | SL | | SL | ||
| Kimi K2 | SL | SL | SL | |||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | SL | |||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | SL | SL | ||||
| GPT-6 Luna | SL | SL | SL | |||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | SL | SL | SL |
SL SAP LeanIX Bizzdesign HorizzonSL first choiceSL named as an alternativeSL argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, SAP LeanIX on the left and Bizzdesign Horizzon on the right.
Bizzdesign HorizzonSL first choiceSL named as an alternativeSL argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, SAP LeanIX on the left and Bizzdesign Horizzon on the right.The direct prompt
The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where SAP LeanIX and Bizzdesign Horizzon stood in it.
SAP LeanIX first, Bizzdesign Horizzon an alternative
8 of 14 modelsBizzdesign Horizzon was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.GPT-5.4 miniSAP LeanIX alternatives: Bizzdesign Horizzon, Orbus Software, Sparx Systems
Gemini 3.5 FlashSAP LeanIX alternatives: Ardoq, Orbus Software, Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect
Grok 4.1 FastSAP LeanIX alternatives: Ardoq, Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect
DeepSeek V4 FlashSAP LeanIX alternatives: Ardoq, Bizzdesign Horizzon, Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect
Kimi K2SAP LeanIX alternatives: Ardoq, Avolution ABACUS, Bizzdesign Enterprise Studio, Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect
GLM 4.7 FlashXSAP LeanIX alternatives: Ardoq, Bizzdesign Horizzon, Sparx Enterprise Architect
MiniMax M2.5Ardoq, SAP LeanIX alternatives: Essential Cloud, Sparx Enterprise Architect
GPT-6 LunaSAP LeanIX alternatives: Ardoq, OrbusInfinity
Neither was the first choice, one was named
3 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Claude Haiku 4.5Ardoq, LeanIX alternatives: Archi, Bizzdesign Horizzon
Qwen 3.7 FlashLeanIX alternatives: Ardoq, Bizzdesign Horizzon, Sparx Systems
Muse Glimmer 30BArdoq alternatives: Bizzdesign Horizzon, SAP LeanIX, Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect
Neither was named
3 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Perplexity SonarLeanIX alternatives: Ardoq, Sparx Enterprise Architect
Mistral SmallSparx Systems Enterprise Architect alternatives: Ardoq, iServer365
Llama 4 MaverickSparx
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
SAP LeanIX leads by five points.
SAP LeanIX5%#5 of 12
Bizzdesign Horizzon0%#12 of 12Mid-marketThe figures above
SAP LeanIX leads by twenty-three points.
SAP LeanIX25%#1 of 10
Bizzdesign Horizzon2%#6 of 10Enterprise
SAP LeanIX leads by forty points.
SAP LeanIX43%#1 of 11
Bizzdesign Horizzon3%#4 of 11What the models said about SAP LeanIX
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.
“SAP LeanIX, if you need a highly bespoke metamodel... That's not a reason to avoid LeanIX if its standard model fits” GPT-6 Luna · negative prompt · soft negative
“Medium-High Risk: Customization & Data Model Rigidity ... LeanIX if you need deep customization” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“Often targets larger enterprises; check if the licensing/price is competitive for <1k users.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · scale prompt · soft negative
“agile cloud-based solutions with strong integration and collaboration features are typically recommended, e.g. SAP LeanIX, Ardoq, or BlueDolphin” Muse Glimmer 30B · scale prompt · first choice
“Choose LeanIX if you want to quickly understand what applications you own, how much they cost, and how they map to business goals.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice
“LeanIX is highly accessible for mid-market companies due to its out-of-the-box usability and modular pricing structure” Gemini 3.5 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice
What the models said about Bizzdesign Horizzon
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Avoid high-end tools like LeanIX, Bizzdesign, or Ardoq” Grok 4.1 Fast · budget prompt · hard negative
“frequently cost upwards of $10,000 to $50,000+ per year, placing them far out of reach for companies with limited budgets” Gemini 3.5 Flash · budget prompt · soft negative
“significantly cheaper than giants like MEGA HOPEX or BiZZdesign” Qwen 3.7 Flash · budget prompt · soft negative
“Choose Bizzdesign if you are a large, highly-regulated enterprise that needs a complete "transformation suite"” Gemini 3.5 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice
“Bizzdesign (strategy-focused)” Grok 4.1 Fast · scale prompt · first choice
“Need architecture to shape business strategy and transformation roadmaps? Compare Bizzdesign Horizzon and OrbusInfinity.” GPT-6 Luna · comparative prompt · alternative
Also compared
SAP LeanIX vs ArdoqSAP LeanIX vs LeanIXSAP LeanIX vs ArchiSAP LeanIX vs Sparx Systems Enterprise ArchitectArdoq vs Bizzdesign HorizzonLeanIX vs Bizzdesign HorizzonArchi vs Bizzdesign HorizzonSparx Systems Enterprise Architect vs Bizzdesign HorizzonAll fifteen head-to-head pages and the full EA tools standing
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.